On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:55 AM, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
If we're going that way, I'd rather just use what we have and change the
PNP
code to match. (Let it create dynamic devices but pass more information
in
the info structure so that the enables get set, etc.) The hierarchy buys
us
nothing if we just make lots of little files and types.
I think this makes the most sense.
I'll implement this one and send a patch. I don't like it being labeled dynamic, but I will live (or else I'll change it.)
Thanks, Myles