Re: [coreboot] cbfs XIP patch

[Peter Stuge]

Patrick Georgi wrote:
> The "next" field has the disadvantage that we can't simply hot-update 
> anymore, as we'd have to change data (instead of merely adding it).

ron minnich wrote:
> NEXT pointer
>
> All of these will work.

'next' foils the desirable property that single files in cbfs can be
updated in the flash chip without touching any other regions.

//Peter