On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Marc Jones marcj303@yahoo.com wrote:
This would be a good reason to have a generic enable for each device like in v2. Then the enable function can handle anything. I am not sure how or why this changed in v3.
I thought you and I just finished getting this right. It's called phase3_setup_chip_dev. Is this not right? It does what the v2 thing did IIRC.
ron