Am 25.10.2009 17:48, schrieb Uwe Hermann:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 08:36:52PM +0200, svn@coreboot.org wrote:
Some ACPI implementations don't like to see full paths within a scope for CPU power management, so don't add the scope name
Can you add a code comment there, explaining the issue, so that people browsing the code will know about it?
It's a simple error, that linux chose to look over.
The code essentially created (not sure if that's 100% valid acpi syntax, probably not, but you'll get the idea):
Scope(_PR_) { Name(_PR_.CPU0) { etc } }
That nesting is wrong, it should be either
Scope(_PR_) { Name(CPU0) { etc } }
or
Name(_PR_.CPU0) { etc }
Regards, Patrick