Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
AFAIK %p already prints the 0x before the hex value, so buf=%p would be preferable.
Yes, I made a mistake. Maybe the C library on his system is reponsible for the no "0x" output?
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2009-May/047736.html
Other than that, I think the patch improves readability and is Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Thank you.
Do you have commit access or do you want me to commit with the small 0x change?
No, I don't have commit access. Please commit for me. Thanks.
yu ning