Myles Watson wrote:
Absolutely agreed. I think there will have to be another variable like HAS_ACPI_SUPPORT for that to happen.
How about simply ACPI?
I think HAVE_ACPI_TABLES should become GENERATE_ACPI_TABLES
I like that!
and HAVE_ACPI_TABLES should take that new meaning. ACPI isn't specific enough to see what it does without looking elsewhere.
All right.
By the way - maybe we too should store big static tables in cbfs?
//Peter