Re: [coreboot] cbfs XIP patch

[Patrick Georgi]

Am 05.05.2009 19:07, schrieb Peter Stuge:
> 'next' foils the desirable property that single files in cbfs can be
> updated in the flash chip without touching any other regions.

Two options:
1. have next point to 0xffffffff and replace the whole block it's in
2. have next point to a validated clean area (esp. no magic) and force 
the next cbfs_file header there.

2. is better, but there might be the rare corner case that the intended 
area is fixed memory for a new entry.

I guess we can live with that, right?

Patrick