Re: [coreboot] small patch for prototypes and unused variables

[Myles Watson]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:10 AM, ron minnich  wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> > Something like that would be fine with me, but since we'd do it just to
>
> do
> > it, not to make the code cleaner, maybe it's just as good to put the
> > prototypes by the functions.
>
> In the case of that function you need a proto outside the file anyway.
>
> Having to put a proto next to a function makes the whole thing seem
> kind of pointless :-)

Agreed.  I don't like the missing prototype warning.

Myles