Re: [coreboot] build service results for r4795

[Stefan Reinauer]

Myles Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, coreboot information
> <[e-mail] > wrote:
> Dear coreboot readers!
>
> This is the automatic build system of coreboot.
>
> The developer "myles" checked in revision 4795 to
> the coreboot repository. This caused the following
> changes:
>
> Change Log:
> Revert deletion that snuck in to 4794.  Sorry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Acked-by: Myles Watson <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>
>
> Build Log:
> Compilation of a-trend:atc-6220 has been fixed
> ...
> Compilation of amd:db800 is still broken
> See the error log at
> http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=db800&vendor=amd&num=2
> <http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=db800&vendor=amd&num=2>
> ...
> Compilation of digitallogic:msm800sev is still broken
> See the error log at
> http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=msm800sev&vendor=digitallogic&num=2
> <http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=msm800sev&vendor=digitallogic&num=2>
>
> These boards build for me and have 64K left in the ROM.  How can there
> be that big of a difference between my build system and this one?

Maybe you build them without payloads? 64k sounds quite tight for two
payloads, even though it's "just" an old filo...
> Anybody know why they have 128K bootblocks?  It seems a little large.

Can we reduce that? Patrick?

Stefan