On 26.08.2008 00:51, ron minnich wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
This looks like a lar -l error to me, or a load address problem. Did you look at the files that got put in there to make sure the bootblock was really 256MB?
The bootblock is 32k. The bios.bin is 512k. It's just the len in the lar that's bogus.
LAR bug, then. Can you upload the binary somewhere (or mail it privately) so we can have a look?
Regards, Carl-Daniel