Re: [coreboot] IRQ 9 on s2895 and s2892

[Myles Watson]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Rudolf Marek  wrote:
> > I'm assuming that since I have the problem on my Tyan s2895 and s2892,
> > and they have different superIOs that that's not the problem.  What do
> > you think?
>
> Ok then. But it is worth to check if there is no misconfiguration. The IRQ
> regs are on std places.

OK.  I'll compare superiotool output from factory and Coreboot.
> > Ah.  I'm sorry I think you've tried to tell me this multiple times but
> > I've missed it.  You're saying that the IRQ is getting sent to two
> > different IRQs and one of them has a handler, but the other doesn't?
>
> Yes thats what I think. Second option is that it is something else like some
> nVidia ACPI timer, but this is unlikely becuase we would have seen this
> before the changes.
>
> Maybe you can boot orig coreboot sources and see what device listens on IRQ
> 9 ;)

Sure.  I'll try that too.

Thanks,
Myles