On 02/05/2010 10:07 AM, bifferos wrote:
--- On Fri, 5/2/10, Joseph Smithjoe@settoplinux.org wrote:
I don't understand why libpayload is BSD and not GPL? It just doe not make very much sense.
It makes perfect sense to me. This allows OEMs to make closed-source payloads for coreboot, something which may have a positive affect on Coreboot uptake.
Ok, but I don't see how closed-source can ever be a good thing for coreboot. Especially when we boast about our code being open-source for the world to see that it has no security concerns....
To me it sounds like an easy spot for an OEM to slip in what ever they want...