Re: [coreboot] build service results for r4795

[Peter Stuge]

Myles Watson wrote:
> > > > > Anybody know why they have 128K bootblocks?  It seems a little
> > > > > large.
> > > >
> > > > Can we reduce that? Patrick?
> >
> > It isn't 128k. That number is not used. cbfstool adjusts the size.
>
> The 128K was for normal + fallback.

Ok.
> Bootblock sizes are fixed, not adjusted by cbfstool.

I misunderstood Patrick on IRC then. That's very possible.
> > Acked-by: Peter Stuge
>
> Thanks.  Sorry I was impatient.

No problem! As long as it got in. :)

//Peter