On 04/08/08 21:36 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:56:03PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
a patch to apply on top of Ron's commit.
If I'm successful, I'll be undoing 50% of Ron's patch.
That doesn't matter. This is early work in progress. Key word: progress
Doesn't mean we have to commit everything right away though, too. A certain amount of time for reviews and discussions before committing anything is needed and a good idea (doesn't have to be weeks, but at least a few hours or a day or so shouldn't be a problem).
(I'm not commenting on this specific patch or technical issue, but I cannot agree with the general idea of "no delays, commit everything ASAP no matter what").
We need to find the middle ground. Development doesn't have to stop for everybody to give the patch a checkmark. We do _not_ need to be on the same page for the project to proceed. Discussion is good, but not mandatory.
Jordan