On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 09:47:04PM +0000, edward wandasiewicz wrote:
As requested, for rel-1.9.0-46-g636cbb4.
Thanks. So, same as before?
Is it worth testing the double scenario, or maybe put it down to a "manufacturer's flaw" going forward?
I need additional time to think about that and to see if any other similar reports occur. In the mean time, could you pull testing again and retry (with 47-g977a7d4). I think that branch will fix the issue for you (and it could give you a short term workaround if you need that).
-Kevin
With 47-g977a7d4, we get
1. YES - we get no duplicate of the Philips, and get just one of each appear in the boot list, Mushkin & Philips
2. NO - we sometimes get just the Mushkin only - no Philips detected - with both devices plugged in, about 1 in 10 cold boot starts - both plugged in USB 3 port and both plugged in Type C port
The 2 Type C cables used, are those from the Google Play Store, for the record.
cbmem attached for each.
Edward.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 09:47:04PM +0000, edward wandasiewicz wrote:
As requested, for rel-1.9.0-46-g636cbb4.
Thanks. So, same as before?
Is it worth testing the double scenario, or maybe put it down to a "manufacturer's flaw" going forward?
I need additional time to think about that and to see if any other similar reports occur. In the mean time, could you pull testing again and retry (with 47-g977a7d4). I think that branch will fix the issue for you (and it could give you a short term workaround if you need that).
-Kevin