On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 09:58 -0700, Marc Jones wrote:
Not-yet-signed-off-by: David Woodhouse David.Woodhouse@intel.com
would-be-acked-by: Marc Jones marc.jones@se-eng.com
Thanks. I've updated the git tree at git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/seabios.git accordingly.
The 'not yet' bit has been revoked, btw. The bureaucracy is done and it's ready for merging once it's passed review.
The main thing that bothers me is the UMBStart,UMBEnd fields and corresponding patch to OVMF; we haven't finalised that side of it yet but we certainly *need* it.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:31 PM, David Woodhouse dwmw2@infradead.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 09:58 -0700, Marc Jones wrote:
Not-yet-signed-off-by: David Woodhouse David.Woodhouse@intel.com
would-be-acked-by: Marc Jones marc.jones@se-eng.com
Thanks. I've updated the git tree at git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/seabios.git accordingly.
The 'not yet' bit has been revoked, btw. The bureaucracy is done and it's ready for merging once it's passed review.
Thanks. In general it looks good - I hope to provide more feedback this weekend.
The main thing that bothers me is the UMBStart,UMBEnd fields and corresponding patch to OVMF; we haven't finalised that side of it yet but we certainly *need* it.
This bothers me a little as well. Would it be possible to separate out the UMBStart/End stuff into a separate patch. (The main patch would assume OVMF doesn't lock 0xc0000-0xfffff at all, and the UMBStart/End patch would assume that OVMF has your proposed extensions.)
-Kevin