On 08/05/2013 10:34 PM, Fred . wrote:
Maybe rename Windows 2001, 2006, and 2009 to their real names?
The names were decided by Microsoft, not by me.
Or use their NT kernel name instead, like NT 6.1, NT 6.2, etc.
Same here.
Or add a comment in the source code like: “Windows 2009” /* Windows 7 */ || "Windows 2012" /* Windows Server 2012 */ ||
Yeah, this can work.
Paolo
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> > From my quick research, it looks like "Windows 2006" || "Windows > > 2006.1" || "Linux" would work, but I have not tested it. > > > > Paolo > > This doesn't work in that it matches linux. Note that the above was meant to be a condition for when to _show_ the PCI hole, i.e. negated compared to your example. > ATM it looks like we should test > "Windows 2000" || > "Windows 2001" || > "Windows 2001 SP1" || > "Windows 2001.1 SP1" Including this may be too strict, what about 98/ME? > && !( > "Windows 2006" || > "Windows 2006.1" || We know that these are all implied by the following four: > "Windows 2006 SP1" || > "Windows 2006 SP2" || > "Windows 2009" || > "Windows 2012" || So it is not necessary to test these four. > "Linux" || > "FreeBSD" > ) && > _OS == "Microsoft Windows NT" > && > _REV == 0x1 Testing _OS and _REV is probably too strict. > This should match XP and 2003 as tightly as possible. > Please note "Linux" is there just in case, modern > Linux OSPM does not identify itself as "Linux". Yeah, I know. I didn't know about FreeBSD, and I agree it is better to include it just in case. Paolo _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org <mailto:SeaBIOS@seabios.org> http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios