On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:27:55PM +0100, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
And with verbose logging (level 8).
[...] Wcall16 with invalid stack
Strange. Can you report the output with the patch below?
-Kevin
--- a/src/stacks.c +++ b/src/stacks.c @@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ call16(u32 eax, u32 edx, void *func) { ASSERT32FLAT(); if (getesp() > MAIN_STACK_MAX) - panic("call16 with invalid stack\n"); + panic("call16 with invalid stack eax=%x edx=%x func=%p esp=%x\n" + , eax, edx, func, getesp()); if (CONFIG_CALL32_SMM && Call16Data.method == C16_SMM) return call16_smm(eax, edx, func);
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:51:30PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:27:55PM +0100, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
And with verbose logging (level 8).
[...] Wcall16 with invalid stack
Strange. Can you report the output with the patch below?
Using the patch below would be even better.
-Kevin
--- a/src/stacks.c +++ b/src/stacks.c @@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ call16(u32 eax, u32 edx, void *func) { ASSERT32FLAT(); if (getesp() > MAIN_STACK_MAX) - panic("call16 with invalid stack\n"); + panic("call16 with invalid stack eax=%x edx=%x func=%p esp=%x ret=%p\n" + , eax, edx, func, getesp(), __builtin_return_address(0)); if (CONFIG_CALL32_SMM && Call16Data.method == C16_SMM) return call16_smm(eax, edx, func);
Wcall16 with invalid stack: eax=dfbf3e62 edx=0 func=0x000f9563 esp=dfbf3e50
.text._farcall16 0x9563 : { *(.text._farcall16) }
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:27:55PM +0100, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
And with verbose logging (level 8).
[...] Wcall16 with invalid stack
Strange. Can you report the output with the patch below?
-Kevin
--- a/src/stacks.c +++ b/src/stacks.c @@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ call16(u32 eax, u32 edx, void *func) { ASSERT32FLAT(); if (getesp() > MAIN_STACK_MAX)
panic("call16 with invalid stack\n");
panic("call16 with invalid stack eax=%x edx=%x func=%p esp=%x\n"
if (CONFIG_CALL32_SMM && Call16Data.method == C16_SMM) return call16_smm(eax, edx, func);, eax, edx, func, getesp());
Wcall16 with invalid stack: eax=dfbf3e62 edx=0 func=0x000f9563 esp=dfbf3e50 ret=0x000f2304
│.text:000F22C8 sub_F22C8 proc near ; CODE XREF: sub_F2309+2Cvp ▒ │.text:000F22C8 ; sub_F2309+35vj
▒ │.text:000F22C8
▒ │.text:000F22C8 var_2A = byte ptr -2Ah
▒ │.text:000F22C8 var_1A = byte ptr -1Ah
▒ │.text:000F22C8 var_E = byte ptr -0Eh
▒ │.text:000F22C8 var_D = byte ptr -0Dh
▒ │.text:000F22C8 var_6 = word ptr -6
▒ │.text:000F22C8
▒ │.text:000F22C8 push ebx
▒ │.text:000F22C9 sub esp, 28h
▒ │.text:000F22CC mov ebx, eax
▒ │.text:000F22CE mov ecx, 26h
▒ │.text:000F22D3 xor edx, edx
▒ │.text:000F22D5 lea eax, [esp+2Ch+var_2A]
▒ │.text:000F22D9 call sub_F1BA0
▒ │.text:000F22DE mov [esp+2Ch+var_6], 200h
▒ │.text:000F22E5 mov [esp+2Ch+var_D], 0Eh
▒ │.text:000F22EA mov [esp+2Ch+var_E], bl
· │.text:000F22EE mov [esp+2Ch+var_1A], 7
▒ │.text:000F22F3 mov edx, offset word_FD2EA
▒ │.text:000F22F8 movzx edx, dx
▒ │.text:000F22FB lea eax, [esp+2Ch+var_2A]
▒ │.text:000F22FF call sub_F22A6
▒ │.text:000F2304 add esp, 28h
▒ │.text:000F2307 pop ebx
▒ │.text:000F2308 retn
▒ │.text:000F2308 sub_F22C8 endp
▒
00001ba0 R_386_PC32 .text.pci_probe_devices .text.asm.irq_trampoline_0x10 0xd2ea : { *(.text.asm.irq_trampoline_0x10) }
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:51:30PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:27:55PM +0100, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
And with verbose logging (level 8).
[...] Wcall16 with invalid stack
Strange. Can you report the output with the patch below?
Using the patch below would be even better.
-Kevin
--- a/src/stacks.c +++ b/src/stacks.c @@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ call16(u32 eax, u32 edx, void *func) { ASSERT32FLAT(); if (getesp() > MAIN_STACK_MAX)
panic("call16 with invalid stack\n");
panic("call16 with invalid stack eax=%x edx=%x func=%p esp=%x
ret=%p\n"
if (CONFIG_CALL32_SMM && Call16Data.method == C16_SMM) return call16_smm(eax, edx, func);, eax, edx, func, getesp(), __builtin_return_address(0));