2017-07-31 14:29 GMT+03:00 Marcel Apfelbaum marcel@redhat.com:
On 29/07/2017 2:37, Aleksandr Bezzubikov wrote:
On PCI init PCI bridges may need some extra info about bus number to reserve, IO, memory and prefetchable memory limits. QEMU can provide this with a special vendor-specific PCI capability.
Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Bezzubikov zuban32s@gmail.com
hw/pci/pci_bridge.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c index 720119b..e9f12d6 100644 --- a/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c +++ b/hw/pci/pci_bridge.c @@ -408,6 +408,43 @@ void pci_bridge_map_irq(PCIBridge *br, const char* bus_name, br->bus_name = bus_name; }
Hi Alexksander,
+int pci_bridge_qemu_cap_init(PCIDevice *dev, int cap_offset,
uint8_t bus_reserve, uint32_t io_reserve,
uint16_t non_pref_reserve, uint64_t
pref_reserve,
Error **errp)
Maybe we should change it to something like pci_bridge_res_reseve_cap_init ? Maybe we will have other caps in the future.
+{
- size_t cap_len = sizeof(PCIBridgeQemuCap);
- PCIBridgeQemuCap cap = {
.len = cap_len,
.type = REDHAT_PCI_CAP_QEMU,
.bus_res = bus_reserve,
.non_pref_16 = non_pref_reserve
- };
- if ((uint8_t)io_reserve == io_reserve) {
cap.io_8 = io_reserve;
- } else {
cap.io_32 = io_reserve;
- }
- if ((uint16_t)pref_reserve == pref_reserve) {
cap.pref_32 = pref_reserve;
- } else {
cap.pref_64 = pref_reserve;
- }
- int offset = pci_add_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR,
cap_offset, cap_len, errp);
- if (offset < 0) {
return offset;
- }
- memcpy(dev->config + offset + PCI_CAP_FLAGS,
(char *)&cap + PCI_CAP_FLAGS,
cap_len - PCI_CAP_FLAGS);
- return 0;
+}
- static const TypeInfo pci_bridge_type_info = { .name = TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE, .parent = TYPE_PCI_DEVICE,
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h index ff7cbaa..e9b7cf4 100644 --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h @@ -67,4 +67,32 @@ void pci_bridge_map_irq(PCIBridge *br, const char* bus_name, #define PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS 0x400 /* Discard timer status */ #define PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_SERR 0x800 /* Discard timer SERR# enable */ +typedef struct PCIBridgeQemuCap {
- uint8_t id; /* Standard PCI capability header field */
- uint8_t next; /* Standard PCI capability header field */
- uint8_t len; /* Standard PCI vendor-specific capability header
field */
- uint8_t type; /* Red Hat vendor-specific capability type.
Types are defined with REDHAT_PCI_CAP_ prefix */
- uint16_t non_pref_16; /* Non-prefetchable memory limit */
- uint8_t bus_res; /* Minimum number of buses to reserve */
- uint8_t io_8; /* IO space limit in case of 8-bit value */
- uint32_t io_32; /* IO space limit in case of 32-bit value
This 2 values are mutually exclusive,
i.e. they can't be >0 both*/
- uint32_t pref_32; /* Prefetchable memory limit
in case of 32-bit value */
- uint64_t pref_64; /* Prefetchable memory limit
in case of 64-bit value
This 2 values are mutually exclusive (just
as
IO limit), i.e. they can't be >0 both */
The same comments as for the SeaBIOS series, can the capability be more simple? uint32_t bus_res uint32_t io_res uint32_t mem_res uint32_t pref_32_res uint64_t pref_64_res
In this version I've designed it just as Laszlo suggested - whenever we have variable-size fields - like IO and prefetchable - we use mutually exclusive fields. I think now we should choose one common format and fix it for the future, otherwise every next version it will cause new questions.
It is possible I missed some arguments, I'll have another look on the thread.
Thanks, Marcel
+} PCIBridgeQemuCap;
+#define REDHAT_PCI_CAP_QEMU 1
+int pci_bridge_qemu_cap_init(PCIDevice *dev, int cap_offset,
uint8_t bus_reserve, uint32_t io_reserve,
uint16_t mem_reserve, uint64_t
pref_reserve,
Error **errp);
- #endif /* QEMU_PCI_BRIDGE_H */