On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:42:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-08-28 20:54, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 28.08.2011, at 02:42, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/26/2011 08:32 AM, ya su wrote:
hi,Avi:
I met the same problem, tons of hpet vm_exits(vector 209, faultaddress is in the guest vm's hpet mmio range), even I disable hpet device in win7 guest vm, it still produce a larget amount of vm_exits when trace-cmd ; I add -no-hpet to start the vm, it still has HPET device inside VM.
Does that means the HPET device in VM does not depend on theemulated hpet device in qemu-kvm? Is there any way to disable the VM HPET device to prevent so many vm_exits? Thansk.
Looks like a bug to me.
IIRC disabling the HPET device doesn't remove the entry from the DSDT, no? So the guest OS might still think it's there while nothing responds (read returns -1).
Exactly. We have a fw_cfg interface in place for quite a while now (though I wonder how the firmware is supposed to tell -no-hpet apart from QEMU versions that don't provide this data - both return count = 255), but SeaBios still exposes one HPET block at a hard-coded address unconditionally.
There was quite some discussion about the corresponding Seabios patches back then but apparently no consensus was found. Re-reading it, I think Kevin asked for passing the necessary DSDT fragments from QEMU to the firmware instead of using a new, proprietary fw_cfg format. Is that still the key requirement for any patch finally fixing this bug?
My preference would be to use the existing ACPI table passing interface (fw_cfg slot 0x8000) to pass different ACPI tables to SeaBIOS.
SeaBIOS doesn't currently allow that interface to override tables SeaBIOS builds itself, but it's a simple change to rectify that.
When this was last proposed, it was raised that the header information in the ACPI table may then not match the tables that SeaBIOS builds. I think I proposed at that time that SeaBIOS could use the header of the first fw_cfg table (or some other fw_cfg interface) to populate the headers of its table headers. However, there was no consensus.
Note - the above is in regard to the HPET table. If the HPET entry in the DSDT needs to be removed then that's a bigger change.
-Kevin