Il 15/05/2014 20:57, Kevin O'Connor ha scritto:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 06:36:08PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I think this is more easily visible on top of these patches more than the other way round, but I'm biased of course...
I was referring to your patch 5, which adds a bunch of assembler variables - I think it would be clearer to add them in C to start.
Ah, sure. The C conversion patch belongs between patch 4 and patch 5 in this series, roughly.
Paolo