On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 05:09:47AM +0000, Xu, Quan wrote:
From: Stefan Berger [mailto:stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com] On 03/27/2015 03:58 AM, Xu, Quan wrote:
From: Xu, Quan
From: Stefan Berger [mailto:stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com] On 03/26/2015 07:01 AM, Xu, Quan wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger [mailto:stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > On 03/25/2015 06:42 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:10:03AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: >>> On 03/23/2015 08:13 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: >>>> Because of the mixed 16bit/32bit code in SeaBIOS, all assembler >>>> must use size suffixes - so the above should be "roll" instead of "rol". >>> Ok, fixed. >>> >>>> As before - both issues are minor and can be addressed after >>>> merge (as long as there is agreement that the sha1.c file can >>>> be licensed as LGPLv3). >>> It can have that license. I can post v11 or you can modify it, >>> either way is fine. >> Thanks. I pushed the first three patches into a test branch at: >> >> https://github.com/KevinOConnor/seabios/tree/tcg-testing >> >> I'd like to get confirmation that this works for the Xen >> requirements before merging. > I don't use Xen. I hope that Quan will provide feedback. > > Stefan Sure, I am glad to help you test it :):) Try to https://github.com/KevinOConnor/seabios/tree/tcg-testing ??
Yes.
[...]
I will go through all of these seabios patch, and try to make it compatible for Xen vTPM.
What's the status of this? Is it safe to push forward parts of Stefan's patches, or does that represent a regression for Xen?
-Kevin