17 Jun
2019
17 Jun
'19
3:13 p.m.
On 17 Jun 2019, at 17:48, Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:36:54AM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote:
So overall, WDYT? Keep it extendible for a low price of ABI + “bootdevices” name. Or go strict and rename to “bios-geometries”?
If we add another qemu to firmware interface I think the interface should be documented. I also think that a mix of an ascii and binary interface is going to be difficult to describe and document. I'd prefer a pure ascii interface - for example a newline separated list of four space separted fields: <device name> <cylinders> <heads> <spt>
We can go pure ascii. I meanwhile sent a v3 QEMU and v2 SeaBIOS patches for more comments.
Sam
-Kevin