On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 09:35:52AM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:51:21PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:47:28PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
From: Gleb Natapov gleb@redhat.com
QXL device is powered down during S3, so tell this to a guest OS in AML code.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov gleb@redhat.com
I'm sending this after talking to Gleb who ok-ed it. Note that I've added the compiled dsl file since it was already checked in. Should I send this as two patches?
Also, my understanding is that the acpi part is only used by qemu, not on physical hardware, so no need to test it on anything else, correct?
Thanks.
Is the patch from you Alon, or did Gleb write it? Does this depend on a change to qemu/kvm code or is this separate?
Gleb wrote it, I set the Author to him, and the Signed-off-by I kept. This is a cleaned up commit from the rhel-6 internal tree. (cleaned up - removed a space :)
I haven't submitted it upstream when I wrote it because back then QXL was not in qemu yet.
It's not necessary to test ACPI changes on physical hardware. It's fine to send the dsl file, but not necessary as I can regenerate it as well.
Ok.
-Kevin
-- Gleb.