On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:35:13PM +0800, Wayne Xia wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wayne Xia xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thanks - see my comments below.
[...]
--- /dev/null +++ b/src/bmp.c @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +/* +* Basic BMP data process functions. +* Could used to adjust pixel data format, get infomation, etc. +* +* Copyright (C) 2011 Wayne Xia xiawenc@cn.ibm.com +* +* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later. +*/
SeaBIOS is licensed under LGPLv3.
[...]
--- /dev/null +++ b/src/bmp.h @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +#ifndef BMP_H +#define BMP_H +#include "types.h"
+#define WIDTHBYTES(bits) (((bits)+31)/32*4)
+typedef u8 BYTE; +typedef u32 BYTE4;
Can u32/u8 be put into the struct definitions themselves instead of adding these typedefs?
[...]
--- a/src/boot.c +++ b/src/boot.c @@ -372,23 +372,56 @@ boot_add_cbfs(void *data, const char *desc, int prio) static void interactive_bootmenu(void) {
- if (! CONFIG_BOOTMENU || ! qemu_cfg_show_boot_menu())
- int filecfg_size;
- u8 *filecfg_p = romfile_loadfile("bootsplash.cfg", &filecfg_size);
- u8 showflag_normal;
- u16 splash_time;
- if (filecfg_p != NULL && filecfg_size >= 4) {
showflag_normal = *filecfg_p;
splash_time = *(filecfg_p+2)+(*(filecfg_p+3)<<8); /* little endian */
free(filecfg_p);
Could you separate out the time configuration into a separate patch from the BMP viewing?
[...]
- while (get_keystroke(0) >= 0)
- while (get_keystroke(0) >= 0) { ;
- }
The SeaBIOS style is to not use braces around one line statements. Should style changes be necessary to existing code it should go in a separate patch.
[...]
--- a/src/bootsplash.c +++ b/src/bootsplash.c
[...]
- dprintf(5, "Decompressing bootsplash.jpg\n");
- ret = jpeg_show(jpeg, picture, width, height, depth);
- if (ret) {
dprintf(1, "jpeg_show failed with return code %d...\n", ret);
goto done;
- if (type == 0) {
dprintf(5, "Decompressing bootsplash.data\n");
ret = jpeg_show(jpeg, picture, width, height, depth);
if (ret) {
dprintf(1, "jpeg_show failed with return code %d...\n", ret);
goto done;
}
picture_post = picture;
post_flag |= SWITCH_RGB;
if (depth == 24 && mode_info->bytes_per_scanline >= width * 24 / 8) {
bmp_data_format_proc_24bpp(picture_post, picture, width, height,
width * 24 / 8, mode_info->bytes_per_scanline, post_flag);
}
I'm confused by this - why is the jpeg path calling the bmp_x function?
- } else {
picture_post = malloc_tmphigh(imagesize);
if (!picture_post) {
warn_noalloc();
goto done;
}
memcpy(picture_post, filedata+data_offset, filesize-data_offset);
post_flag |= SWITCH_LINE;
if (depth == 24 && mode_info->bytes_per_scanline >= width * 24 / 8) {
bmp_data_format_proc_24bpp(picture_post, picture, width, height,
width * 24 / 8, mode_info->bytes_per_scanline, post_flag);
}
}free(picture_post);
Can the above be collappsed into a function bmp_show() so that it more closely mirrors the jpeg_show() code path?
Thanks again, -Kevin