On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 12:49 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:56:22AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
We expect to use the space between the top of option ROMs and the bottom of our own BIOS code as a stack. OVMF was previously marking the whole region from 0xC0000 to 0xFFFFF read-only before invoking our Legacy16Boot method. Read-only stack considered harmful.
Version 0.98 of the CSM spec adds the UmaAddress and UmaSize fields, which allow the CSM to specify a memory region that needs to be writable.
There exists CONFIG_MALLOC_UPPERMEMORY which we could turn off to use the 9-segment, but that isn't particularly useful for the CSM case either because that memory isn't ours to play with until the final Legacy16Boot call. There's a LowPmmMemory given to use by UEFI to play with, but that's right in the *middle* of low memory and using that for persistent allocations would be painful. So just require CONFIG_MALLOC_UPPERMEMORY when building a CSM.
Hi David,
Are you still looking at this? If I recall correctly, you were going to run a test without CONFIG_MALLOC_UPPERMEMORY set.
That appears to make it boot OK, although I'm still not sure it's *correct* to be using the 9-segment from the CSM before we've actually been told to *boot*. Maybe we just get lucky.
Do you want a version of the patch which doesn't add the dependency on CONFIG_MALLOC_UPPERMEMORY?