On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:36:58PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:04:57AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/03/2011 08:30 AM, Kevin O'Connor Write:
I think it's reasonable to require that a user supplied DSDT still fill certain requirements. Keep in mind that the reason for the "user supplied" DSDT was for new platform (q35) development - not necessarily so each individual user could set their own.
I do not think it's reasonable to require that a user supplied DSDT still fill certain requiements.
Please elaborate on why.
The dependency on the DSDT is a few methods (PCEJ, CPEJ, CPST, CPMA).
The one that seems unavoidable is PCI0.