On 12/20/2010 10:49 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:57:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:49:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:11:29PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:08:59PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Use _RMV method to indicate whether device can be removed.
Data is retrieved from QEMU via I/O port 0xae0c.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosattimtosatti@redhat.com
Thanks Marcelo,
Can you add acked-bys from the qemu/kvm maintaners?
Marcelo is kvm maintainer ;) FWIW I tested this with Windows 7& XP and it works as expected. The patch relies on patch not yes excepted to qemu though.
Yeah - I know - but I figured I'd ask for concensus before committing. :-)
The committing of seabios patches that have a dependency on qemu/kvm is an area that I think could be better clarified. I'm thinking that if the seabios part depends on something in qemu/kvm then we should have the corresponding kvm/qemu maintaners "ack" it.
-Kevin
Avi, are you OK with this patch ?
Yes, perhaps it all (including PCI hotplug controller) should be using something else than hardcoded IO ports, but thats what we have now.
At least it should be documented.
What's the behaviour with a qemu that doesn't support the new port? We don't strictly support it, but let's do so if we can.