On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 19:11 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If we did this right in QEMU, we'd have to introduce a QOM property anyway
... and then we'd have to update each firmware implementation to know about this new property, and the how it translates to the RESET_REG field in the DSDT, etc.
So we *still* end up having to update firmwares to keep up with qemu, much more than we would if we'd generated the tables on the qemu side.