Marcel,
The findings are pretty consistent with what I identified. Although it looks like SeaBIOS fairs better than UEFI.
Thanks for the headsup, will reply on the thread itself.
Ray K
-----Original Message----- From: Marcel Apfelbaum [mailto:marcel@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 3:53 AM To: Kinsella, Ray ray.kinsella@intel.com; Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net Cc: Tan, Jianfeng jianfeng.tan@intel.com; seabios@seabios.org; Michael Tsirkin mst@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] >256 Virtio-net-pci hotplug Devices
On 07/08/2017 22:00, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
Hi Marcel,
Hi Ray,
Please have a look on this thread, I think Laszlo and Paolo found the root cause. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-08/msg01368.html It seems hot-plugging the devices would not help.
Thanks, MArcel
Yup - I am using Seabios by default. I took all the measures from the Kernel time reported in syslog. As Seabios wasn't exhibiting any obvious scaling problem.
Ray K
-----Original Message----- From: Marcel Apfelbaum [mailto:marcel@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 5:43 AM To: Kinsella, Ray ray.kinsella@intel.com; Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net Cc: Tan, Jianfeng jianfeng.tan@intel.com; seabios@seabios.org; Michael Tsirkin mst@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] >256 Virtio-net-pci hotplug Devices
It is an issue worth looking into it, one more question, all the measurements are from OS boot? Do you use SeaBIOS? No problems with the firmware?
Thanks, Marcel