See the v2 implementation of this patch.
I replaced:
--- @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static void intel_igd_setup(struct pci_device *dev, void *arg) pci_config_writel(bdf, 0x5C, cpu_to_le32((u32)addr));
dprintf(1, "Intel IGD BDSM enabled at 0x%08x, size %lldMB, dev " - "00:02.0\n", (u32)addr, bdsm_size >> 20); + "%02x:%02x.%x\n", (u32)addr, bdsm_size >> 20, + 0, 2, 0); } } ---
So it will look like the format string a few lines above:
dprintf(1, "Intel IGD OpRegion enabled at 0x%08x, size %dKB, dev “ "%02x:%02x.%x\n", (u32)addr, opregion->size >> 10, pci_bdf_to_bus(bdf), pci_bdf_to_dev(bdf), pci_bdf_to_fn(bdf));
This solves the version problem
Sam
On 20 May 2019, at 5:10, Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 09:58:59PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote:
I wanted it to look more consistent with a dprintf just a few lines above:
dprintf(1, "Intel IGD OpRegion enabled at 0x%08x, size %dKB, dev " "%02x:%02x.%x\n", (u32)addr, opregion->size >> 10, pci_bdf_to_bus(bdf), pci_bdf_to_dev(bdf), pci_bdf_to_fn(bdf));
What do you think?
I'd use the dprintf(1, "%pP", dev) form instead.
-Kevin