On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:29:06PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 00:03 -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Thanks. Do you know if we're likely to see additional types (ie, something other than 0,1,3,4,16,17,32)?
We already supply a pretty good set of the basic types. I won't rule out adding new ones, but it doesn't seem likely.
Thanks. If there are no further comments, I'll commit this in the next couple of days.
-Kevin