On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:40:38PM +0200, Sven Schnelle wrote:
Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net writes:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:20:23AM +0200, Sven Schnelle wrote: [...]
That patch wasn't complete, sorry. I've attached another version ;)
[...]
struct ehci_qh { u32 next; @@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ struct ehci_qh { u32 alt_next; u32 token; u32 buf[5];
- // u32 buf_hi[5];
-} PACKED;
- u32 buf_hi[5];
+} PACKED __aligned(EHCI_QH_ALIGN);
I don't think the ehci_qh needs to be padded to 128 bytes as it isn't allocated in arrays. Not specifiying the alignment allows the other fields in the ehci_pipe struct to use that pad space instead of it being wasted. Let me know if I've missed something.
You didn't miss anything. it's ok to remove that padding.
How about the below? [..]
Looks ok to me.
Thanks - I committed it.
-Kevin