On 06/15/2011 03:17 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/15/2011 02:58 PM, Jason Krieg wrote:
On 09/21/2010 02:31 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Without this BIOS fails to remap 0xf0000 memory from ROM to RAM so writes to F-segment modify ROM content instead of memory copy. Since QEMU does not reloads ROMs during reset on next boot modified copy of BIOS is used.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapovgleb@redhat.com diff --git a/hw/piix_pci.c b/hw/piix_pci.c index 933ad86..0bf435d 100644 --- a/hw/piix_pci.c +++ b/hw/piix_pci.c @@ -99,10 +99,6 @@ static void i440fx_update_memory_mappings(PCII440FXState *d) int i, r; uint32_t smram, addr;
- if (kvm_enabled()) {
/* FIXME: Support remappings and protection changes. */
return;
- } update_pam(d, 0xf0000, 0x100000, (d->dev.config[I440FX_PAM]>>
4)& 3); for(i = 0; i< 12; i++) { r = (d->dev.config[(i>> 1) + (I440FX_PAM + 1)]>> ((i&
- 4))& 3;
-- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
While testing migration from old to new kvm ( 0.12.5 to 0.14.x ) and after fixing some other problems mainly version_id probs in some of the VMStateDescriptions everything was working fine until I tried to migrate Windows guests they would crash after running some time. Linux guests are running stable.
So I decided to do a git bisect to identify the according commit. Reverting this commit fixes this problem with Windows guests.
What consequences might it have not updating these memory mappings ?
Resets may fail.
Does this commit need a specific seabios version, we have seabios 0.6.0 with qemu-kvm 0.12.5 and seabios 0.6.1.2 with qemu-kvm 0.14.1 ?
IIUC newer seabios depends on this commit, but this commit does not depend on seabios.
Maybe instead of reverting this commit one could check the seabios version in this method and only do an update of these piix PAM registers if running with a newer seabios version ?
It would be better to first understand what's going wrong.
I presume (just guessing) Windows wrote to F-segment modifying the ROM and now gets confused if these PAM registers are updated.
Any ideas for what I could look for ?