On 01/27/17 15:27, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:39AM +0100, Filippo Sironi wrote:
When running Linux on an Intel machine with a commodity BIOS, CPUs are numbered starting from 0 and the first half refers to the first logical CPU on each core while the second half refers to the second logical CPU on each core. As an example, on machine with 2 sockets, 4 cores per socket, and 2 logical CPUs per core, CPUs would be numbered:
- 0 1 2 3 - first logical CPU on each core of socket 0
- 4 5 6 7 - first logical CPU on each core of socket 1
- 8 9 10 11 - second logical CPU on each core of socket 0
- 12 13 14 15 - second logical CPU on each core of socket 1
With seabios (prior to this patch), CPU 0 would be the first logical CPU on core 0 of socket 0, CPU 1 would be the second logical CPU on core 0 of socket 0, and so on. This is due to the fact that processor_id and local_apic_id are assigned with the same value when building MADT.
Exhaust the most-significant 7 bits of the 8-bit APIC ID and then come back to the least-significant bit when assigning local_apic_id, since the least-significant bit identifies the second logical CPU on a core.
If HTT isn't available, keep the previous behavior.
Signed-off-by: Filippo Sironi sironi@amazon.de
src/fw/acpi.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/fw/acpi.c b/src/fw/acpi.c index 8bc2ca6..864c247 100644 --- a/src/fw/acpi.c +++ b/src/fw/acpi.c
The acpi.c code in seabios is deprecated. With all recent version of qemu/kvm the acpi tables are obtained from qemu. So, if there is a desired change to the tables then a patch should be made for qemu.
QEMU constructs minimal / condensed APIC IDs so that they precisely correspond to the socket / core / thread hierarchy requested on the command line. If I remember correctly, the algorithm was implemented directly from Intel's MP spec. If the APIC IDs in the guest don't look as desired, I think the -smp option might have to be tweaked.
I also seem to recall that this spec-adherent behavior could be machine type dependent (i.e., unavailable before a specific machine type). The machtypes not conforming to it should be ancient IMO.
CC'ing Eduardo and Igor.
Thanks Laszlo