On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:50:50AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.02.22 02:52, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:39:10PM +0100, Florian Larysch wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:37:52AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Thanks. I don't know enough about NVMe to review this patch though. Maybe Julian or Alex could comment?
Happy to hear their comments on this. However, I can also try to explain the reasoning in a bit more detail.
This follows from the NVMe spec[1]: The Identify command returns a data structure that contains packed LBAF records (Figure 249, starting at offset 131). This is represented by struct nvme_identify_ns in the SeaBIOS code.
Figure 250 gives the structure of these records and this is where the aforementioned discrepancy lies.
Thanks. I agree that this should be fixed in SeaBIOS.
However, your patch removes the "reserved" field, which doesn't look correct. It sounds like the "res" struct member should remain, but the "lbads" and "rp" members should be turned into a new "lbads_rp" member. Also, the nvme.c code should be updated so that the read of lbads performs the proper bit masking.
Looking at the spec, lbads is a full well aligned 8 bits. The collision here is between rp and res, with rp taking only 2 bits and res the remaining 6.
Ah, I misread the spec. So, the original patch removing the "res" struct member should be fine.
Is using bitfields acceptable in SeaBIOS? If so, the patch below should automatically give us masking as well.
I'd recommend against using C bitfields to access hardware registers.
-Kevin