Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978 )
Change subject: [WIP] mb/acer: Add Acer Aspire ES1-572
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/5/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
File src/mainboard/acer/es1-572/devicetree.cb:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/5/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS5, Line 223: register "SendVrMbxCmd" = "2"
> I don't think, there is any reason to show it as advanced setting in vendor fw, if that is for fixin […]
What I could find out: There are issues with (some) IMVP8 controllers.
IslVrCmd: "specific VRs [...] require tunings before sending SETVID command to '0V'"
"0 - No VR command sent"
"1 - A VR mailbox command is sent for IA and GT rails only." (type=pcode, cmd=0x80000012, data=0)
"2 - A VR mailbox command is sent for IA, GT, and SA rails." (type=pcode, cmd=0x80000012, data=1)
see CB:22763
The "specific VRs" are at least ISL9585X/ISL9586X.
--
SendVrMbxCmd (deprecated in KBL): "VR specific mailbox commands."
"0 - No VR command sent."
"01b - A VR mailbox command specifically for the MPS IMPV8 VR will be sent." (workaround to enter PS4, type=pcode, cmd=0x80000E18, data=1)
"10b - VR specific command sent for PS4 exit issue." (type=pcode, cmd=0x80000034, data=0)
"11b - send both"
bitwise encoding
SendVrMbxCmd1 (only in KBL): "VR specific mailbox commands."
"000b - no VR specific command sent."
"001b - A VR mailbox command specifically for the MPS IMPV8 VR will be sent." (workaround to enter PS4, type=pcode, cmd=0x80000E18, data=1)
"010b - VR specific command sent for PS4 exit issue." (type=pcode, cmd=0x80000034, data=0)
"100b - VR specific command sent for MPS VR decay issue." (type=pcode, cmd=0x80000038, data=1)
bitwise encoding
According to CB:18200 the PS4 exit issue applies to MP2939 (IMVP8) but not MPS2949 (IMVP9/8).
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id98788a2c5e54f70fd1cacbd70d636f5e63b2619
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38978
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-CC: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 12:17:55 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978 )
Change subject: [WIP] mb/acer: Add Acer Aspire ES1-572
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(2 comments)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7//COMMIT_MSG@37
PS7, Line 37: - Touchpad. Hangs off either EC or some I2C controller and needs ACPI.
> I doubt it's wired using PS/2 to the EC
Well, it's connected to the EC's PS/2 port 3 (according to the kb9012 ds). It could be I2C as well, depending on the actual ec. Anyway, direct I2C/SMBus is better than <whatever> via PS/2 through ec.
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/5/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
File src/mainboard/acer/es1-572/devicetree.cb:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/5/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS5, Line 223: register "SendVrMbxCmd" = "2"
> I haven't seen any information on it either. […]
I don't think, there is any reason to show it as advanced setting in vendor fw, if that is for fixing an erratum. wdym with "goes gold"?
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id98788a2c5e54f70fd1cacbd70d636f5e63b2619
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38978
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-CC: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 10:58:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44775 )
Change subject: treewide: stop using hexdumps for SPD files
......................................................................
Patch Set 27:
> Patch Set 27:
>
> > Patch Set 27: Code-Review-1
> >
> > > Patch Set 27: Code-Review+1
> > >
> > > > Patch Set 27:
> > > >
> > > > > I'd vote for not checking binaries into the coreboot source tree at all. Personally, I'd like to get rid of the vbt binaries and have a tool to compile them as well. My understanding was that there wasn't documentation for the VBT fields, but it seems that maybe this is no longer the case. [1]
> > > >
> > > > In general I agree, but it seems hard to get authoritative sources on the precise format, even for SPD dumps - that ought to be standardized but get repurposed in lots of "wonderful" ways by memory reference code. As far as we know, the "spec" to these files is the reference code, and that's not public.
> > > >
> > > > Some of the SPD tools we use on newer chipsets (for lp4x?) may come close to that. In which case: why ship hex dumps or binaries at all?
> > > >
> > > > > As far as vendors adding custom flags, I don't see how binary vs text solves any problem there.
> > > > The transition here removes the hex-to-bin translation that's been fragile. Michael offers a patch that fixes things for him - that I'm relatively sure breaks building that part of the tree on other UNIX systems, since I vaguely remember having had these issues myself. My guess would be Solaris but it might be some odd BSD as well.
> > > >
> > > > The text files we ship are plain hex dumps. They don't add anything of value, do they? So why should we pretend that they're "source" and make our live miserable?
> > > >
> > > > My proposal is to get this in to remove the pain point that this is dealing with (the fragile hex-to-bin translation) and whoever is motivated to do so looks into providing a higher level description for these files and translating things to that, removing the opaque datasets we have (no matter the format) from the tree.
> > >
> > > spd_tools was already updated to output binary SPD files, so now spd_tools is not usable for adding parts until this change goes in. So this is a 2nd vote for getting this in as is to unblock spd_tools.
> > >
> > > spd_tools generates SPD binaries from a json input. This could certainly be made part of the build so the generated SPD binaries do not need to be checked in. The only blocker is golang support in the build or rewriting the tool in a supported language.
> >
> > Why not revert the change that made spd_tools output binaries instead? I'm not convinced using binaries would help with the issue at hand.
>
> So revert or patch spd_tools to support both hex and binary with a commandline flag. Michael, do you have a preference?
I don't have any preference here. Let's just revert it. If we decide later that we need hex output again, this can be added with a flag.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44775
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0f24183a872924cddcfdf7587cc0c126da900f91
Gerrit-Change-Number: 44775
Gerrit-PatchSet: 27
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Couzens <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Guckian <david.guckian(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jeremy Soller <jeremy(a)system76.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Piotr Król <piotr.krol(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Rob Barnes <robbarnes(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vanessa Eusebio <vanessa.f.eusebio(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 10:39:38 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Angel Pons has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978 )
Change subject: [WIP] mb/acer: Add Acer Aspire ES1-572
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(4 comments)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7//COMMIT_MSG@37
PS7, Line 37: - Touchpad. Hangs off either EC or some I2C controller and needs ACPI.
> it's connected to EC via PS2 and to SoC via I2C. […]
I doubt it's wired using PS/2 to the EC
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
File src/mainboard/acer/es1-572/devicetree.cb:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 37: register "SataTestMode" = "1"
> well, do you really test that low-level or did you just enable it because it says "test" and you wan […]
Yes, I do want that.
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
File src/mainboard/acer/es1-572/gpio.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 7: #define PAD_CFG_NF_BUF_TRIG(a, b, c, d, e, f) PAD_CFG_NF(a, b, c, d)
> just drop e and f below and used PAD_CFG_NF. […]
I'd rather re-do the whole file.
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 144: _PAD_CFG_STRUCT(GPP_B3,
: PAD_FUNC(GPIO) | PAD_RESET(PLTRST) |
: PAD_CFG0_TRIG_LEVEL | PAD_CFG0_RX_POL_YES |
: PAD_BUF(TX_DISABLE),
: PAD_PULL(NONE)),
:
> PAD_CFG_GPI_APIC_EDGE_LOW(GPP_B3, NONE, PLTRST) for touchpad interrupt
I'll re-do the whole file
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id98788a2c5e54f70fd1cacbd70d636f5e63b2619
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38978
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-CC: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 08:26:05 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Angel Pons has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45131 )
Change subject: lib/Makefile.inc: fail build when SPD would be empty
......................................................................
Patch Set 14:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45131/14/src/lib/Makefile.inc
File src/lib/Makefile.inc:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45131/14/src/lib/Makefile.inc@360
PS14, Line 360: test -n "$(SPD_SOURCES)" || \
: (echo "HAVE_SPD_BIN_IN_CBFS is set but SPD_SOURCES is empty" && exit 1)
> In my opinion, we should allow a board to have empty SPD_SOURCES even when HAVE_SPD_IN_CBFS is set. […]
I'd rather avoid getting such incomplete states of board variants into the tree. I expect boards that make it into master to be able to boot, even if half of the features (e.g. Wi-Fi, touchpad, touchscreen, suspend and resume...) don't work. I don't mind if the initial commit adds just a single SPD source, and the rest get added later.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45131
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic6db1dbe5fed5f242e408bcad4f36dda1b1fa1b4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 45131
Gerrit-PatchSet: 14
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Caveh Jalali <caveh(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Wu <david_wu(a)quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: 9elements QA <hardwaretestrobot(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 08:23:28 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978 )
Change subject: [WIP] mb/acer: Add Acer Aspire ES1-572
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(3 comments)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7//COMMIT_MSG@37
PS7, Line 37: - Touchpad. Hangs off either EC or some I2C controller and needs ACPI.
it's connected to EC via PS2 and to SoC via I2C. ACPI is done by the cb i2c driver, when added to the devicetree. fortunately, no need to manually hack around. have a look at CB:43623 for a working example
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
File src/mainboard/acer/es1-572/gpio.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 7: #define PAD_CFG_NF_BUF_TRIG(a, b, c, d, e, f) PAD_CFG_NF(a, b, c, d)
just drop e and f below and used PAD_CFG_NF. they are not needed to be set for native functions, which is why the macro was removed
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 144: _PAD_CFG_STRUCT(GPP_B3,
: PAD_FUNC(GPIO) | PAD_RESET(PLTRST) |
: PAD_CFG0_TRIG_LEVEL | PAD_CFG0_RX_POL_YES |
: PAD_BUF(TX_DISABLE),
: PAD_PULL(NONE)),
:
PAD_CFG_GPI_APIC_EDGE_LOW(GPP_B3, NONE, PLTRST) for touchpad interrupt
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id98788a2c5e54f70fd1cacbd70d636f5e63b2619
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38978
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-CC: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 08:18:34 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978 )
Change subject: [WIP] mb/acer: Add Acer Aspire ES1-572
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
File src/mainboard/acer/es1-572/devicetree.cb:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 37: register "SataTestMode" = "1"
> Because I want to test SATA? 😄
well, do you really test that low-level or did you just enable it because it says "test" and you want to test? :D SataTestMode=1 modifies HSIO settings (lane eq boost and others) and buffer settings.
Why not test it in normal mode? (I did; works fine)
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id98788a2c5e54f70fd1cacbd70d636f5e63b2619
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38978
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-CC: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 08:07:33 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978 )
Change subject: [WIP] mb/acer: Add Acer Aspire ES1-572
......................................................................
Patch Set 9:
(4 comments)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
File src/mainboard/acer/es1-572/devicetree.cb:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 40: register "SataPortsDevSlp[0]" = "0"
: register "SataPortsDevSlp[1]" = "0"
:
> the latter part is exactly why I've left these here.
schematics say nooooo ;)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 42: SataSpeedLimit" = "3"
speed 3 (also matches 0) is the default already
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 108: device pci 04.0 off end # CPU Thermal Subsystem
> why on? […]
it's not about EC ACPI and it's not only about DPTF. device 4 also gets used by linux to read/set TCC and for rapl power limits
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
File src/mainboard/acer/es1-572/romstage.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978/7/src/mainboard/acer/es1-572…
PS7, Line 32: /* These settings are most likely useless if using a release build of FSP */
: mem_cfg->PcdDebugInterfaceFlags = 2; /* 2: Enable UART */
: mem_cfg->PcdSerialIoUartNumber = 2; /* 2: Use UART #2 */
: mem_cfg->PcdSerialDebugBaudRate = 7; /* 7: 115200 baud */
: mem_cfg->PcdSerialDebugLevel = 3; /* 3: Log <= Info */
:
well, that's all fsp defaults (except the TH bit in PcdSerialIoUartNumber, which doesn't do anything with TH disabled)
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38978
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id98788a2c5e54f70fd1cacbd70d636f5e63b2619
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38978
Gerrit-PatchSet: 9
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-CC: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 08:01:01 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Caveh Jalali has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45889 )
Change subject: mb/google/volteer: Expand WP_RO region to 8MB in fmap
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45889/2/src/mainboard/google/volte…
File src/mainboard/google/volteer/chromeos.fmd:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45889/2/src/mainboard/google/volte…
PS2, Line 9: # SPI flash only the top 16MiB actually gets memory mapped.
> +1 to what Julius and Tim said. […]
intel recently bumped up these regions by 2MB to allow headroom for CSE Lite in CB:43790.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45889
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I72fe8b6a1f91390c218230c0c20825769ebd1e0b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 45889
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Caveh Jalali <caveh(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 07:17:13 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak(a)chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment