build bot (Jenkins) has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/29563 )
Change subject: security/tpm: Fix TCPA log feature
......................................................................
Patch Set 14:
(2 comments)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29563/14/src/include/memlayout.h
File src/include/memlayout.h:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29563/14/src/include/memlayout.h@168
PS14, Line 168: #define VBOOT2_TPM_LOG(addr, size) \
Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while loop
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29563/14/src/include/memlayout.h@168
PS14, Line 168: #define VBOOT2_TPM_LOG(addr, size) \
macros should not use a trailing semicolon
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/29563
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic93133531b84318f48940d34bded48cbae739c44
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29563
Gerrit-PatchSet: 14
Gerrit-Owner: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Hendricks <david.hendricks(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh(a)siemens.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Rudolph (1001864)
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:57:29 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: No
Frans Hendriks has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/29662 )
Change subject: soc/intel/braswell: Add C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK support
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(2 comments)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29662/5/src/soc/intel/braswell/bootblock/ca…
File src/soc/intel/braswell/bootblock/cache_as_ram_cbootblock.S:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29662/5/src/soc/intel/braswell/bootblock/ca…
PS5, Line 21: #include <device/pci_def.h>
> that looks like a copy of drivers/intel/fsp1_1/cache_as_ram.inc. […]
Specific support (provide timestamp, bootblock_pre_c_entry label) for C bootblock is required.
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29662/2/src/soc/intel/braswell/romstage/car…
File src/soc/intel/braswell/romstage/car_stage.S:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29662/2/src/soc/intel/braswell/romstage/car…
PS2, Line 23:
> What I meant is 2. Replace all occurence of romstage_c_entry on braswell with car_stage_c_entry. […]
Replacing with car_stage_c_entry() results into a build error on the Intel Quark platforms which have this function in SoC and uses FSP1.1
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/29662
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iab48ad72f1514c93f20d70db5ef4fd8fa2383e8c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29662
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:38:21 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: No
Patrick Rudolph has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/29662 )
Change subject: soc/intel/braswell: Add C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK support
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(2 comments)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29662/5/src/soc/intel/braswell/bootblock/ca…
File src/soc/intel/braswell/bootblock/cache_as_ram_cbootblock.S:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29662/5/src/soc/intel/braswell/bootblock/ca…
PS5, Line 21: #include <device/pci_def.h>
that looks like a copy of drivers/intel/fsp1_1/cache_as_ram.inc.
Why do you need to duplicate it ?
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29662/2/src/soc/intel/braswell/romstage/car…
File src/soc/intel/braswell/romstage/car_stage.S:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/29662/2/src/soc/intel/braswell/romstage/car…
PS2, Line 23:
> I agree that might change filename into car_stage_entry.S, but don't understand your comment: […]
What I meant is 2. Replace all occurence of romstage_c_entry on braswell with car_stage_c_entry. In that case you don't need this file at all.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/29662
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iab48ad72f1514c93f20d70db5ef4fd8fa2383e8c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29662
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:14:32 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: No
Frans Hendriks has abandoned this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/29660 )
Change subject: drivers/intel/fsp1_1: Add post console init functions for C bootblock
......................................................................
Abandoned
Corrupted this check in by patchset 2
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/29660
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: abandon
Gerrit-Change-Id: I12e613147e5203022cd453693a115fca002ce480
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29660
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Hello build bot (Jenkins),
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/29660
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: drivers/intel/fsp1_1: Add post console init functions for C bootblock
......................................................................
drivers/intel/fsp1_1: Add post console init functions for C bootblock
The console post init functions are not executed in C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK
mode.
Add car_XXXX_post_console_init functions to romstage_c_entry().
BUG=NA
TEST=Portwell PQ7-M107
Change-Id: I12e613147e5203022cd453693a115fca002ce480
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
---
M src/soc/intel/braswell/Kconfig
M src/soc/intel/braswell/Makefile.inc
A src/soc/intel/braswell/bootblock/bootblock_c.c
A src/soc/intel/braswell/bootblock/cache_as_ram_cbootblock.S
M src/soc/intel/braswell/romstage/Makefile.inc
A src/soc/intel/braswell/romstage/car_stage_entry.S
6 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/60/29660/2
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/29660
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Change-Id: I12e613147e5203022cd453693a115fca002ce480
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29660
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Frans Hendriks has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/29661 )
Change subject: soc/intel/braswell: Add support for FSP MR2
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
> Patch Set 2:
>
> FSP MR2 seems to not be compatible (is it possible!?) with the braswell SoC I have:
> Intel Atom x5-E8000 CPU 1.04GHz
> Cpuid 000406c4 cpus 4 rid 35 step D1
>
> Although FPS signature and revision is detected well:
>
> FSP Signature: BSWSBFSP
> FSP Header Version: 2
> FSP Revision: 1.1.4.1
>
> I'm stuck at post FSP MemoryInit (0x92). I have to stick to older FSP I guess. I have also checked whether I use the unsupported UPD values, but it is not the case. Is it supported only on CherryChill CRB?
Portwell M107 used same CPU, where it works fine.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/29661
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id40b5d46ddda93845d9739b56aaf7ad24ee89246
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29661
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:08:41 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-HasLabels: No
Michał Żygowski has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/29661 )
Change subject: soc/intel/braswell: Add support for FSP MR2
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
FSP MR2 seems to not be compatible (is it possible!?) with the braswell SoC I have:
Intel Atom x5-E8000 CPU 1.04GHz
Cpuid 000406c4 cpus 4 rid 35 step D1
Although FPS signature and revision is detected well:
FSP Signature: BSWSBFSP
FSP Header Version: 2
FSP Revision: 1.1.4.1
I'm stuck at post FSP MemoryInit (0x92). I have to stick to older FSP I guess. I have also checked whether I use the unsupported UPD values, but it is not the case. Is it supported only on CherryChill CRB?
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/29661
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id40b5d46ddda93845d9739b56aaf7ad24ee89246
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29661
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks(a)eltan.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski(a)3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:59:23 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-HasLabels: No