Attention is currently required from: Andrey Petrov, Arthur Heymans, Bora Guvendik, Christian Walter, Felix Held, Fred Reitberger, Jason Glenesk, Johnny Lin, Lean Sheng Tan, Matt DeVillier, Patrick Rudolph, Paul Menzel, Ronak Kanabar, Shuo Liu, Tim Chu, Wonkyu Kim.
Hello Andrey Petrov, Arthur Heymans, Bora Guvendik, Christian Walter, Felix Held, Fred Reitberger, Jason Glenesk, Johnny Lin, Lean Sheng Tan, Matt DeVillier, Patrick Rudolph, Ronak Kanabar, Shuo Liu, Tim Chu, Wonkyu Kim,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80277?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#4).
Change subject: drivers/intel/fsp2_0: Support FSP 2.4 64-bits
......................................................................
drivers/intel/fsp2_0: Support FSP 2.4 64-bits
FSP 2.4 brings FSP 64-bits support which requires some adjustments in
coreboot:
- Stack alignment:
1. FSP functions must be called with the stack 16-bytes aligned.
This is already setup properly with the default value of the
`mpreferred-stack-boundary' compiler option (4).
2. The FSP stack buffer supplied by coreboot through the `StackBase'
UPD must be 16-bytes aligned.
- The EDK2 EFIAPI macro definition relies on compiler flags such as
__GNUC__ which is not working well when included by coreboot. While it
has no side-effect on i386 because the C calling convention used by
coreboot and FSP are the same, it breaks on x86_64 because FSP/UEFI
uses the Microsoft x64 calling convention while coreboot uses the
System V AMD64 ABI.
Fortunately, EDK2 header allows to override the EFIAPI
definition. The __ms_abi__ attribute works for both i386 and x86_64.
This attribute has to be set to all functions calling or called by
the FSP.
- Add fsp print helper macros to print `efi_return_status_t' with the
appropriate format
Change-Id: If0397f5cc8d0f4f1872bd37a001fe42e0c37ec99
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
---
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/debug.c
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/fsp_debug_event.c
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/include/fsp/debug.h
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/include/fsp/fsp_debug_event.h
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/include/fsp/info_header.h
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/include/fsp/soc_binding.h
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/include/fsp/util.h
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/memory_init.c
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service1.c
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service2.c
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/silicon_init.c
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/util.c
M src/include/efi/efi_datatype.h
M src/soc/amd/common/fsp/fsp_reset.c
M src/soc/intel/common/fsp_reset.c
15 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/77/80277/4
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80277?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: If0397f5cc8d0f4f1872bd37a001fe42e0c37ec99
Gerrit-Change-Number: 80277
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrey Petrov <andrey.petrov(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Johnny Lin <Johnny_Lin(a)wiwynn.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Shuo Liu <shuo.liu(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Chu <Tim.Chu(a)quantatw.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Wonkyu Kim <wonkyu.kim(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-CC: Appukuttan V K <appukuttan.vk(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-CC: Ashish Kumar Mishra <ashish.k.mishra(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-CC: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-CC: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Wonkyu Kim <wonkyu.kim(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Attention: Andrey Petrov <andrey.petrov(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Johnny Lin <Johnny_Lin(a)wiwynn.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Christian Walter <christian.walter(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Shuo Liu <shuo.liu(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Tim Chu <Tim.Chu(a)quantatw.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: Paul Menzel.
Julius Werner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80254?usp=email )
Change subject: commonlib: Add assembly optimization for ipchksum() on arm64
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80254/comment/541599d8_0ad72bee :
PS2, Line 10: to take advantage of larger load
: sizes and the add-with-carry instruction
> Excuse my ignorance, but why can’t the compilers do that themselves?
It's very hard to write C code for this in the first place because the C language has no means to describe the carry that gets shifted out of the end of a data type. The best I can come up with is to check it afterwards like this
```
for (size_t i = 0; i < size; i++) {
uint64_t new_sum = result + *data++;
if (new_sum < result)
new_sum++;
result = new_sum;
}
```
and interestingly the compiler does make something clever out of that on both x86
```
10: 48 03 04 d7 add (%rdi,%rdx,8),%rax
14: 48 83 d0 00 adc $0x0,%rax
18: 48 83 c2 01 add $0x1,%rdx
1c: 48 39 d6 cmp %rdx,%rsi
1f: 75 ef jne 10 <sum+0x10> (File Offset: 0x50)
```
and Arm
```
8: f8637804 ldr x4, [x0, x3, lsl #3]
c: 91000463 add x3, x3, #0x1
10: ab040042 adds x2, x2, x4
14: 9a823442 cinc x2, x2, cs // cs = hs, nlast
18: eb03003f cmp x1, x3
1c: 54ffff61 b.ne 8 <sum+0x8> (File Offset: 0x48) // b.any
```
but it's not really as clever as my code. In general I found that for very tight loops when every instruction can make a significant performance difference, GCC still doesn't really get as good as handcrafted assembly. (Also, when writing code that so explicitly tries to bait a specific instruction, one could argue that just writing the assembly directly is actually more readable.)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80254/comment/f6d7ec59_1c24940a :
PS2, Line 12: by more than 20x
> Thank you for documenting this. […]
They're not really worth mentioning (a couple of microseconds) because the coreboot tables that get checksummed by this are pretty small (at least on the platform I tested). I did this mostly for fun tbh, not for serious gain. I think some other platforms are also using that checksum for other things so it might help them a bit more (we used to use it for MRC cache where the impact was actually significant, but now that was replaced with xxhash already).
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80254?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9c7bbc9d7a1cd083ced62fe9222592243a796077
Gerrit-Change-Number: 80254
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yidi Lin <yidilin(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 21:57:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Angel Pons, Arthur Heymans, Hung-Te Lin, Jakub Czapiga, Jérémy Compostella, Paul Menzel, Yidi Lin, Yu-Ping Wu.
Julius Werner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80251?usp=email )
Change subject: lib: Move IP checksum to commonlib
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80251/comment/81dee1ce_a7f996e8 :
PS2, Line 16: calculatted
> calculated?
Done
Patchset:
PS2:
> ok for the arm/mtk related files. […]
I don't see a conflict? Rebased again, just in case.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80251?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic04c714c00439a17fc04a8a6e730cc2aa19b8e68
Gerrit-Change-Number: 80251
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yidi Lin <yidilin(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Attention: Yidi Lin <yidilin(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 21:55:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Angel Pons, Arthur Heymans, Hung-Te Lin, Jakub Czapiga, Julius Werner, Jérémy Compostella, Yidi Lin, Yu-Ping Wu.
Hello Angel Pons, Arthur Heymans, Hung-Te Lin, Jakub Czapiga, Jérémy Compostella, Yidi Lin, Yu-Ping Wu, build bot (Jenkins),
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80251?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#3).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Code-Review+1 by Hung-Te Lin, Code-Review+2 by Arthur Heymans, Code-Review+2 by Yidi Lin, Verified+1 by build bot (Jenkins)
Change subject: lib: Move IP checksum to commonlib
......................................................................
lib: Move IP checksum to commonlib
This patch moves the IP checksum algorithm into commonlib to prepare for
it being shared with libpayload. The current implementation is ancient
and pretty hard to read (and does some unnecessary questionable things
like the type-punning stuff which leads to suboptimal code generation),
so this reimplements it from scratch (that also helps with the
licensing).
This algorithm is prepared to take in a pre-calculated "wide" checksum
in a machine-register-sized data type which is then narrowed down to 16
bits (see RFC 1071 for why that's valid). This isn't used yet (and the
code will get optimized out), but will be used later in this patch
series for architecture-specific optimization.
Change-Id: Ic04c714c00439a17fc04a8a6e730cc2aa19b8e68
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
---
M src/arch/x86/boot.c
M src/commonlib/Makefile.mk
A src/commonlib/bsd/include/commonlib/bsd/ipchksum.h
A src/commonlib/bsd/ipchksum.c
M src/drivers/elog/boot_count.c
M src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1/hob.c
M src/drivers/net/ne2k.c
D src/include/ip_checksum.h
M src/lib/Makefile.mk
D src/lib/compute_ip_checksum.c
M src/lib/coreboot_table.c
M src/northbridge/intel/haswell/broadwell_mrc/raminit.c
M src/northbridge/intel/haswell/haswell_mrc/raminit.c
M src/northbridge/intel/ironlake/raminit.c
M src/northbridge/intel/sandybridge/raminit_mrc.c
M src/soc/intel/common/basecode/ramtop/ramtop.c
M src/soc/intel/common/block/cse/cse_lite_cmos.c
M src/soc/mediatek/common/memory.c
M src/soc/mediatek/mt8183/memory.c
M src/southbridge/intel/bd82x6x/early_pch.c
M tests/commonlib/bsd/Makefile.mk
A tests/commonlib/bsd/ipchksum-test.c
M tests/lib/Makefile.mk
D tests/lib/compute_ip_checksum-test.c
24 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/51/80251/3
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80251?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic04c714c00439a17fc04a8a6e730cc2aa19b8e68
Gerrit-Change-Number: 80251
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yidi Lin <yidilin(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Hung-Te Lin <hungte(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Attention: Yidi Lin <yidilin(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso(a)google.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: Felix Held, Fred Reitberger, Jason Glenesk, Matt DeVillier.
Hello Fred Reitberger, Jason Glenesk, Matt DeVillier, build bot (Jenkins),
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80298?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: soc/amd/phoenix/chip.h: guard FSP-specific data structures
......................................................................
soc/amd/phoenix/chip.h: guard FSP-specific data structures
Since the USB configuration data structure is FSP-specific, add guards
on this part of the soc_amd_phoenix_config struct and the corresponding
include.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I6c324421fbc3dc7b9a7bf6f5868785e9718147a5
---
M src/soc/amd/phoenix/chip.h
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/98/80298/2
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80298?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6c324421fbc3dc7b9a7bf6f5868785e9718147a5
Gerrit-Change-Number: 80298
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: Anil Kumar K, Arthur Heymans, Bora Guvendik, Chen, Gang C, Cliff Huang, Jamie Ryu, Jérémy Compostella, Kane Chen, Karthik Ramasubramanian, Krishna P Bhat D, Lance Zhao, Pratikkumar V Prajapati, Ravishankar Sarawadi, Ronak Kanabar, Shuo Liu, Subrata Banik, Tim Wawrzynczak, V Sowmya, Wonkyu Kim.
Gaggery has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77255?usp=email )
Change subject: [Squash]: Add ACPI BDAT support
......................................................................
Patch Set 14:
(3 comments)
File src/soc/intel/common/block/acpi/acpi_bdat.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77255/comment/b8dca13e_6f3963e0 :
PS14, Line 175: memcpy(next_block, schema_data, data_size);
> Can we make sure in ACPI BDAT spec, all schema data are not pointers? if no pointers, the directly c […]
Regarding the spec of BDAT, the schema_data itself does not contain pointers. Please refer to memory schema 2/2B/4/4B and RMT schema 4/5. The memcpy is the efficient way to do so. Please let me know if you still have concerns.
File src/soc/intel/common/block/include/intelblocks/acpi_bdat.h:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77255/comment/c9f0add9_c093c165 :
PS14, Line 66: EFI_GUID schema_hob_guids[MAX_SCHEMA_LIST_LENGTH];
> Can we use base/size instead? a.k.a. […]
I'm not sure how to accommodate the code of handling ways other than hobs as I don't have a platform to test that scenario. The best way I can think of is to search for the guids in hobs, if it couldn't it form the hobs, then looking for the guids from a weak function that should be implemented by the platform code. Does it sound good? And could you please elaborate more about base/size?
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77255/comment/5e93c9f0_907d6548 :
PS14, Line 67: } bdat_schema_list_hob;
> Can we rename it as bdat_schema_list? a.k.a. […]
I am not sure if the structure from non-hobs should leverage the same structure.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77255?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5eb57f65ef5f24458f09587b7c7694156f2ed1ce
Gerrit-Change-Number: 77255
Gerrit-PatchSet: 14
Gerrit-Owner: Gaggery <gaggery.tsai(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anil Kumar K <anil.kumar.k(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Chen, Gang C <gang.c.chen(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Cliff Huang <cliff.huang(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jamie Ryu <jamie.m.ryu(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kane Chen <kane.chen(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Krishna P Bhat D <krishna.p.bhat.d(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Lance Zhao <lance.zhao(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ravishankar Sarawadi <ravishankar.sarawadi(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Shuo Liu <shuo.liu(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Wawrzynczak <inforichland(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: V Sowmya <v.sowmya(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Wonkyu Kim <wonkyu.kim(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-CC: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Anil Kumar K <anil.kumar.k(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Cliff Huang <cliff.huang(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Wonkyu Kim <wonkyu.kim(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Jérémy Compostella <jeremy.compostella(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Ravishankar Sarawadi <ravishankar.sarawadi(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Krishna P Bhat D <krishna.p.bhat.d(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Attention: Kane Chen <kane.chen(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: V Sowmya <v.sowmya(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Lance Zhao <lance.zhao(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Jamie Ryu <jamie.m.ryu(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Subrata Banik <subratabanik(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Chen, Gang C <gang.c.chen(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Tim Wawrzynczak <inforichland(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Shuo Liu <shuo.liu(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 21:32:38 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Shuo Liu <shuo.liu(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Karthik Ramasubramanian, Nick Vaccaro.
Shelley Chen has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80303?usp=email )
Change subject: mb/google/brox: Fix the I2C configuration
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80303?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9f24beb9ef587163362cc6ded88efb05be1329b9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 80303
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Shelley Chen <shchen(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 21:02:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment