Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244 )
Change subject: [RFC|WIP] soc/intel/skylake: replace native SGX initialization by FSP
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
> Patch Set 2:
>
> > Patch Set 2:
> >
> > > Patch Set 2:
> > >
> > > > Patch Set 2:
> > > >
> > > > if i remember correctly, this programming sequence requirement was from cannon-lake onwards. skylake/kabylake can still use native (coreboot) sgx init flow.
> > >
> > > On SKL LT_MEMORY_LOCK has to be set, too, and FSP does this with SkipMpInit=0. AFAICT native SGX init can't be used on SKL for the same reasons we can't use it on CNL.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > From cannon-lake onwards, sgx init needs fsp for the reasons mentioned in https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36356/2/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/f…. i guess mp-ppi may also be used for cannon-lake onwards. Please follow Nate's recommendation for that.
> > > >
> > > > PS: I see my gmail was added earlier and that notification was in spam. Thanks for adding my @intel email. I am off next week, I’ll respond the following week if there are follow-up questions.
> > >
> > > See CB:36356. Native SGX init is not used in CNL, so there is nothing more to do.
> >
> > "FSP-S must be able to write and lock some registers that would be immutable after setting LT_LOCK_MEMORY."* I dont think i got into this issue when i wrote native sgx init flow. At that time i was able to activate the SGX and lock it correctly by using native code only. i created enclaves also from the application and checked it was encrypted and working as expected.
> >
> > @Nate: is this* valid for SKL/KBL as well?
>
Yes, this is valid and exactly the point, why native SGX init can't be used. LT_MEMORY_LOCK must be set, *before* native SGX init (well, more specifically before microcode reload). That conflicts with the requirement of FSP-S to be able to write registers.
> At that time i was able to activate the SGX and lock it correctly by using native code only. i created enclaves also from the application and checked it was encrypted and working as expected
Yes, SGX works. No, not in a secure way with native SGX init without LT_MEMORY_LOCK.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4251c6f1155ae7d1f0cd9064af55cd346ec88845
Gerrit-Change-Number: 44244
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Niewöhner
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nathaniel L Desimone <nathaniel.l.desimone(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratik Prajapati <pratik.prajapati(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 22:44:30 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244 )
Change subject: [RFC|WIP] soc/intel/skylake: replace native SGX initialization by FSP
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
> Patch Set 2:
>
> > Patch Set 2:
> >
> > > Patch Set 2:
> > >
> > > if i remember correctly, this programming sequence requirement was from cannon-lake onwards. skylake/kabylake can still use native (coreboot) sgx init flow.
> >
> > On SKL LT_MEMORY_LOCK has to be set, too, and FSP does this with SkipMpInit=0. AFAICT native SGX init can't be used on SKL for the same reasons we can't use it on CNL.
> >
> > >
> > > From cannon-lake onwards, sgx init needs fsp for the reasons mentioned in https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36356/2/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/f…. i guess mp-ppi may also be used for cannon-lake onwards. Please follow Nate's recommendation for that.
> > >
> > > PS: I see my gmail was added earlier and that notification was in spam. Thanks for adding my @intel email. I am off next week, I’ll respond the following week if there are follow-up questions.
> >
> > See CB:36356. Native SGX init is not used in CNL, so there is nothing more to do.
>
> "FSP-S must be able to write and lock some registers that would be immutable after setting LT_LOCK_MEMORY."* I dont think i got into this issue when i wrote native sgx init flow. At that time i was able to activate the SGX and lock it correctly by using native code only. i created enclaves also from the application and checked it was encrypted and working as expected.
>
> @Nate: is this* valid for SKL/KBL as well?
Yes, this is valid and exactly the point, why native SGX init can't be used. LT_MEMORY_LOCK must be set, *before* native SGX init (well, more specifically before microcode reload). That conflicts with the requirement of FSP-S to be able to write registers.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4251c6f1155ae7d1f0cd9064af55cd346ec88845
Gerrit-Change-Number: 44244
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Niewöhner
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nathaniel L Desimone <nathaniel.l.desimone(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratik Prajapati <pratik.prajapati(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 22:43:06 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Pratikkumar V Prajapati has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244 )
Change subject: [RFC|WIP] soc/intel/skylake: replace native SGX initialization by FSP
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
> Patch Set 2:
>
> > Patch Set 2:
> >
> > if i remember correctly, this programming sequence requirement was from cannon-lake onwards. skylake/kabylake can still use native (coreboot) sgx init flow.
>
> On SKL LT_MEMORY_LOCK has to be set, too, and FSP does this with SkipMpInit=0. AFAICT native SGX init can't be used on SKL for the same reasons we can't use it on CNL.
>
> >
> > From cannon-lake onwards, sgx init needs fsp for the reasons mentioned in https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36356/2/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/f…. i guess mp-ppi may also be used for cannon-lake onwards. Please follow Nate's recommendation for that.
> >
> > PS: I see my gmail was added earlier and that notification was in spam. Thanks for adding my @intel email. I am off next week, I’ll respond the following week if there are follow-up questions.
>
> See CB:36356. Native SGX init is not used in CNL, so there is nothing more to do.
"FSP-S must be able to write and lock some registers that would be immutable after setting LT_LOCK_MEMORY."* I dont think i got into this issue when i wrote native sgx init flow. At that time i was able to activate the SGX and lock it correctly by using native code only. i created enclaves also from the application and checked it was encrypted and working as expected.
@Nate: is this* valid for SKL/KBL as well?
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4251c6f1155ae7d1f0cd9064af55cd346ec88845
Gerrit-Change-Number: 44244
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Niewöhner
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nathaniel L Desimone <nathaniel.l.desimone(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratik Prajapati <pratik.prajapati(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 22:34:12 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Michael Niewöhner has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244 )
Change subject: [RFC|WIP] soc/intel/skylake: replace native SGX initialization by FSP
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
> Patch Set 2:
>
> if i remember correctly, this programming sequence requirement was from cannon-lake onwards. skylake/kabylake can still use native (coreboot) sgx init flow.
On SKL LT_MEMORY_LOCK has to be set, too, and FSP does this with SkipMpInit=0. AFAICT native SGX init can't be used on SKL for the same reasons we can't use it on CNL.
>
> From cannon-lake onwards, sgx init needs fsp for the reasons mentioned in https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36356/2/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/f…. i guess mp-ppi may also be used for cannon-lake onwards. Please follow Nate's recommendation for that.
>
> PS: I see my gmail was added earlier and that notification was in spam. Thanks for adding my @intel email. I am off next week, I’ll respond the following week if there are follow-up questions.
See CB:36356. Native SGX init is not used in CNL, so there is nothing more to do.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4251c6f1155ae7d1f0cd9064af55cd346ec88845
Gerrit-Change-Number: 44244
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Niewöhner
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nathaniel L Desimone <nathaniel.l.desimone(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratik Prajapati <pratik.prajapati(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 22:07:23 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Pratikkumar V Prajapati has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244 )
Change subject: [RFC|WIP] soc/intel/skylake: replace native SGX initialization by FSP
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
if i remember correctly, this programming sequence requirement was from cannon-lake onwards. skylake/kabylake can still use native (coreboot) sgx init flow.
From cannon-lake onwards, sgx init needs fsp for the reasons mentioned in https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36356/2/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/f…. i guess mp-ppi may also be used for cannon-lake onwards. Please follow Nate's recommendation for that.
PS: I see my gmail was added earlier and that notification was in spam. Thanks for adding my @intel email. I am off next week, I’ll respond the following week if there are follow-up questions.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44244
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4251c6f1155ae7d1f0cd9064af55cd346ec88845
Gerrit-Change-Number: 44244
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Niewöhner
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Singer <felixsinger(a)posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nathaniel L Desimone <nathaniel.l.desimone(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratik Prajapati <pratik.prajapati(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 21:57:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Raul Rangel has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43467 )
Change subject: mb/google/zork: Don't generate power resource for Raydium TS
......................................................................
mb/google/zork: Don't generate power resource for Raydium TS
The Raydium ACPI entry currently provides a reset GPIO and an _ON/_OFF
method to the kernel. These are contradictory. The ownership of the GPIO
should be mutually exclusive between either the OS or the FW. The linux
kernel driver has support for the reset GPIO, so omit the power
resource.
I also changed the default GPIO value to high to leave the device in
reset. The kernel will de-assert this when it's ready to talk with the
device. It also asserts it before entering sleep, so the value is
consistent.
BUG=b:160854397
TEST=Boot trembyle and make sure TS works. Suspend/Resume trembyle 300+
times.
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Change-Id: I23131be5d7109eed660a8bd6e2c156c015aa3c4e
---
M src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_dalboz.c
M src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_trembyle.c
M src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/berknip/overridetree.cb
M src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/dalboz/overridetree.cb
M src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/ezkinil/overridetree.cb
M src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/trembyle/overridetree.cb
6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/67/43467/1
diff --git a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_dalboz.c b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_dalboz.c
index 23b5458..c7e9823 100644
--- a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_dalboz.c
+++ b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_dalboz.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
/* DEV_BEEP_BCLK */
PAD_GPI(GPIO_139, PULL_NONE),
/* USI_RESET */
- PAD_GPO(GPIO_140, LOW),
+ PAD_GPO(GPIO_140, HIGH),
/* USB_HUB_RST_L */
PAD_GPO(GPIO_141, HIGH),
/* BT_DISABLE */
diff --git a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_trembyle.c b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_trembyle.c
index 640b765..4d2e609 100644
--- a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_trembyle.c
+++ b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/gpio_baseboard_trembyle.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
/* DEV_BEEP_BCLK */
PAD_GPI(GPIO_139, PULL_NONE),
/* USI_RESET */
- PAD_GPO(GPIO_140, LOW),
+ PAD_GPO(GPIO_140, HIGH),
/* UART1_RXD - FPMCU */
PAD_NF(GPIO_141, UART1_RXD, PULL_NONE),
/* UART1_TXD - FPMCU */
diff --git a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/berknip/overridetree.cb b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/berknip/overridetree.cb
index 229469e..8491e9d 100644
--- a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/berknip/overridetree.cb
+++ b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/berknip/overridetree.cb
@@ -83,8 +83,6 @@
register "probed" = "1"
register "irq_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_IRQ_EDGE_LOW(GPIO_12)"
register "reset_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_OUTPUT_ACTIVE_HIGH(GPIO_140)"
- register "reset_delay_ms" = "20"
- register "has_power_resource" = "1"
device i2c 10 on end
end
chip drivers/i2c/hid
diff --git a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/dalboz/overridetree.cb b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/dalboz/overridetree.cb
index 81fc4fd..cffc2c3 100644
--- a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/dalboz/overridetree.cb
+++ b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/dalboz/overridetree.cb
@@ -52,8 +52,6 @@
register "probed" = "1"
register "irq_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_IRQ_EDGE_LOW(GPIO_12)"
register "reset_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_OUTPUT_ACTIVE_HIGH(GPIO_140)"
- register "reset_delay_ms" = "20"
- register "has_power_resource" = "1"
device i2c 39 on end
end
chip drivers/i2c/generic
diff --git a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/ezkinil/overridetree.cb b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/ezkinil/overridetree.cb
index f7366ac..64a391e 100644
--- a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/ezkinil/overridetree.cb
+++ b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/ezkinil/overridetree.cb
@@ -75,8 +75,6 @@
register "probed" = "1"
register "irq_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_IRQ_EDGE_LOW(GPIO_12)"
register "reset_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_OUTPUT_ACTIVE_HIGH(GPIO_140)"
- register "reset_delay_ms" = "20"
- register "has_power_resource" = "1"
device i2c 39 on end
end
chip drivers/i2c/hid
diff --git a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/trembyle/overridetree.cb b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/trembyle/overridetree.cb
index 22aced2..e28adc5 100644
--- a/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/trembyle/overridetree.cb
+++ b/src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/trembyle/overridetree.cb
@@ -143,8 +143,6 @@
register "probed" = "1"
register "irq_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_IRQ_EDGE_LOW(GPIO_12)"
register "reset_gpio" = "ACPI_GPIO_OUTPUT_ACTIVE_HIGH(GPIO_140)"
- register "reset_delay_ms" = "20"
- register "has_power_resource" = "1"
device i2c 39 on end
end
chip drivers/i2c/generic
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43467
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I23131be5d7109eed660a8bd6e2c156c015aa3c4e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 43467
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Tim Wawrzynczak has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43494 )
Change subject: soc/intel/common/cpu: Update COS mask calculation for nem enhanced mode
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43494/3//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43494/3//COMMIT_MSG@20
PS3, Line 20:
: Also the COS mask selection is mapped to bit 32:33 of MSR
: IA32_PQR_ASSOC(0xC8F) and need to be updated in edx(maps 63:32) before
: MSR write instead of eax(mas 31:0). This implementation corrects that
: as well.
> I am checking on this, on the SKL, CNL, ICL it still maps to LSB. […]
Gotcha, thanks Aamir, I am finding the documentation around this register kind of confusing 😕
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43494
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I54e047161853bfc70516c1d607aa479e68836d04
Gerrit-Change-Number: 43494
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Usha P <usha.p(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Nick Vaccaro <nvaccaro(a)google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-CC: Shreesh Chhabbi <shreesh.chhabbi(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:59:22 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak(a)chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment