the following patch was just integrated into master:
commit e9e7b20f43617880d1d0300257bb88595bea4e35
Author: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Date: Tue Mar 29 16:48:04 2016 -0700
storm: Fix compilation error
Somehow the missing header file in
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/14182 did not trigger compilation
errors before. Add the required header file to enable proper
compilation of storm.
Change-Id: I83c8f2b5fc41e38c1385ff405370753e6eba2abc
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14185
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer(a)coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
See https://review.coreboot.org/14185 for details.
-gerrit
the following patch was just integrated into master:
commit 79cfcde4589f4ab07a721c509b9fa59060e091cc
Author: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Date: Tue Mar 8 12:34:06 2016 -0800
intel/skylake: Enable PROCHOT
This patch would enable PROCHOT feature in skylake. Asserting
PROCHOT line would throttle the GPU/CPU.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:51142
BRANCH=glados
TEST=manually tested on lars. asserting PROCTHOT by EC
reduces FSP in fish-tank from approx 40 to 20. (50 fish setting),
also CPU freq. drops to from 1600000 to 400000
Change-Id: I8fc0c015ea2c26d20bbbfc619f720f231d540feb
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 1b88b1f183df9c7362d7e58acb0a1fa0b076d56e
Original-Change-Id: Ida8636efc3d8da56ebd3931144d31ab1b88fe806
Original-Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/331690
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie(a)chromium.org>
Original-(cherry picked from commit d091a999c3827179182b62a1274a9b3581f7f006)
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/333073
Original-Commit-Ready: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Original-Tested-by: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati(a)intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14120
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
See https://review.coreboot.org/14120 for details.
-gerrit
the following patch was just integrated into master:
commit 2dfdc7746d0f1b688bb2213e96fcb92e8abaf827
Author: Youvedeep Singh <youvedeep.singh(a)intel.com>
Date: Fri Mar 11 11:08:38 2016 +0530
intel/kunimitsu: configure native mode for GPP_E21
GPP_E_21_DDPC_CTRLDATA is pulled low by default.
This causes 2.5mW leakage from 3.3S to GND via R877.
So configuring GPP_E21 in native mode.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:50958
BRANCH=glados
TEST=Build and boot. Measure Power at 3P3S(R955).
Change-Id: I2bdcb698d0b0cd3228c2e59653ac3fb3b1a26951
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: d01f932cda44b0b44c5494b316aefc43c8b84c52
Original-Change-Id: Ifd13ea4b16108ef98d09891365f0d17831ab5f65
Original-Signed-off-by: Youvedeep Singh <youvedeep.singh(a)intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/332369
Original-Commit-Ready: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj(a)intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14108
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
See https://review.coreboot.org/14108 for details.
-gerrit
the following patch was just integrated into master:
commit a613a311b230d4ecfabd8860d207c286347f9393
Author: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie(a)chromium.org>
Date: Mon Mar 14 09:32:08 2016 -0700
vboot: Handle S3 resume path for TPM initialization
When doing verification of memory init code in verstage vboot
should issue a TPM_Startup(ST_STATE) instead of TPM_Startup(ST_CLEAR)
in order to preserve the flags in TPM_STCLEAR_FLAGS which include
things like physical presence. In doing so we can also skip the rest
of the TPM init work in this function in the S3 resume path.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:50633
BRANCH=glados
TEST=S3 resume on chell and ensure TPM is resumed instead of being
cleared and that 'tpmc getvf|getpf|getf' does not show any difference
in flags between boot and resume.
Change-Id: I7a48eaf7f57d2bc6ebc182178cbe60ceb2ad8863
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f059f39a0f5c2f21e564b9554efacf26a41ad794
Original-Change-Id: I647869202d2f04328764155d3de4cad9edf10ae4
Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie(a)chromium.org>
Original-Previous-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/332434
Original-(cherry picked from commit 5fc7792e4104523569140cd84ce313da721ec34b)
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/332542
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14107
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
See https://review.coreboot.org/14107 for details.
-gerrit
the following patch was just integrated into master:
commit fe4983e5aa0a9d3228d3634116be88e361ec23c3
Author: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie(a)chromium.org>
Date: Mon Mar 14 09:29:09 2016 -0700
intel/fsp1_1: Do not re-init TPM in romstage if already setup in verstage
For platforms that do verification of memory init (and have verstage
execute before romstage) FSP should not attempt to re-initialize the
TPM again in romstage as it has already been done.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:50633
BRANCH=glados
TEST=boot and resume on chell and ensure TPM is not re-initialized
Change-Id: Ied6f39dc8dacdbc3d76070b6135de2308196ff53
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: fefd4d4b3fde4c7fe4b6de304790914b7a2f87d8
Original-Change-Id: I60a2e4e2d73270697218f094527e09d444e6ab56
Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie(a)chromium.org>
Original-Previous-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/332433
Original-(cherry picked from commit 2de1fd57fe1db7960e0bb86c64dccf827fa55742)
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/332299
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin(a)chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14106
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
See https://review.coreboot.org/14106 for details.
-gerrit