Attention is currently required from: Damien Zammit, Arthur Heymans, Alexander Couzens, Patrick Rudolph.
Angel Pons has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50036 )
Change subject: intel: Turn `DEFAULT_RCBA` into a Kconfig symbol
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
File src/southbridge/intel/common/rcba.h:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50036/comment/dff58690_0c0bf2ba
PS4, Line 6: DEFAULT_RCBA
> Maybe rename to something meaningful? E.g. […]
I want to get rid of the define completely.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50036
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I642958fbd6f02dbf54812d6a75d6bc3087acc77a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 50036
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Couzens <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Damien Zammit
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Damien Zammit
Gerrit-Attention: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Attention: Alexander Couzens <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:28:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Michael Niewöhner.
Benjamin Doron has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49140 )
Change subject: soc/intel/skylake/acpi: Add PEP table
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49140/comment/52e29674_1fd92bce
PS3, Line 11:
> > > > > > > Awesome, then at least S0ix states work just fine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That error message comes from the kernel SlpS0 self-test. So, let's test something. I assume `cat /sys/power/mem_sleep` has `s2idle` selected? (With s0ix_enable=1 it should. If not, we have another problem.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes. (I think that's based on the FADT)
> > > > >
> > > > > Right, there is some bit in FADT for that.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does your system stay in sleep after executing `echo freeze >/sys/power/state`?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is the alternative that it wakes immediately? Then yes, it stays in sleep. However, when it does wake, it has always been unlocked. I don't know if that's relevant.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unlocked vs. locked is user-space and depends on the desktop environment. XFCE has an option for locking before going to sleep but that only works when sleep was initiated from the DE.
> > > >
> > > > That makes sense; I thought it might have been a possibility.
> > > >
> > > > > If it wakes immediately with that error, the self-test failed. I'm surprised to see the self-test fail *without* immediate wake, though.... Maybe we have to exclude the SlpS0 state from the table LPIT, when s0ix is not supported on a board :S Could you test this, please? Insert a "return" right before the comment "System (Slp_S0) residency counter" in `src/soc/intel/common/block/acpi/lpit.c` and see if the error disappears.
> > > >
> > > > Based on https://01.org/blogs/qwang59/2020/linux-s0ix-troubleshooting, PC10 without S0ix residency is a possible case. If I understand correctly, that situation would be what I see with this board: No S0ix/failed self-test, but PC10 residency/no immediate wake. I will attempt to troubleshoot that sometime by disabling devices, I suppose, following that link.
> > > >
> > > > I'm also not certain what you mean. If S0ix is disabled, would LPIT factor? Besides, if S0ix does relate to hardware state, but not board-design, shouldn't LPIT always advertise both PC10 residency and system residency to warn about broken S0ix support for a board?
> > >
> > > Well, yes PC10 without S0ix is possible. s0ix_enable means means "PC10 and/or SlpS0 possible". Note that SlpS0 is a substate of s0ix but s0ix != SlpS0.
> > >
> > > The LPIT table contains two entries, one for PC10 (the first one) and SlpS0 (the second one. Based on these entries, the OS decides what *actually* is possible. When PC10 and SlpS0 is advertised but SlpS0 doesn't work, that error triggers. So, I want to test what happens, when SlpS0 is not advertised, because it doesn't apply to your board.
> >
> > I see the same error.
>
> Strange....
I can double-check.
> >
> > Additionally, I noticed while looking over the vendor firmware's LPIT table that it defines the PC10 subtable twice, if I'm reading it correctly (two copies of address 0x632 as "FunctionalFixedHW" - the PKG_C10_RESIDENCY MSR?). Even so, the kernel warns that the system was unable to enter PC10.
>
> Oh yeah, I've seen that too somewhere but I doubt that's correct.
>
> >
> > So, while I was initially surprised to hear that SlpS0 might not apply to my board, perhaps that is the case. I can always try to troubleshoot some other time.
> >
> > > > But regardless: `return` or `return current`? The PC10 residency counter portion does increment "current"
> > >
> > > Yes, you're right, it should be `return current` ofc :-)
> >
> > Was this only for testing, or do you think that the S0ix subtable should only be advertised if S0ix is known to work?
>
> Very good question. S0ix isn't documented very good but I wouldn't advertise something that isn't usable. However, that will require us to introduce a dt option `slps0_supported`. That's already planned but I currently have higher-prio stuff. I'll come back to that asap. If you're curious, have a look on my WIP patches on s0ix.
>
> Since it doesn't seem to make a difference irt that error/warning, let's keep it as-is for now and resolve that as soon as I get back to these patches. Wdyt?
The warning is informative and not harmful, so that's fine by me.
> > If S0ix can be temperamental, I think that the OS should always be able to warn about errors.
>
> Well, when the board does not support SlpS0 (= SlpS0 is unconnected) I wouldn't want the OS to warn about it. That warning/error is triggered by the S0ix self-test, which may also be buggy btw.
Ah. If the pad being disconnected means that lower S0ix states aren't possible, then there might not be anything to debug.
> > Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.
>
> No problem :-)
>
>
> So... last question - I hope I didn't ask that already, but I haven't seen it above. Is this patch the cause for that error message or does the error message appear even without it?
The error is produced by the intel_pmc_core driver, which is only loaded if the PEP table is present?
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49140
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I08d8c1fde4f447e9292a0508649f802fdc2721e1
Gerrit-Change-Number: 49140
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:25:14 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Benjamin Doron <benjamin.doron00(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Michael Niewöhner <foss(a)mniewoehner.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Jason Glenesk, Marshall Dawson, Felix Held.
HAOUAS Elyes has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50266 )
Change subject: soc/amd/common/block/acpi/pm_state: add missing include
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50266
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I22862c2d29f130c741b4817dac00287ecfc71fa2
Gerrit-Change-Number: 50266
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:24:34 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Patrick Rudolph, Angel Pons, Julius Werner, Kyösti Mälkki.
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49942 )
Change subject: console/printk.c: Prevent recursion in print functions
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
> This problem isn't new. It happened a few times in the past already. […]
Maybe we should start by defining what the bug is.
* Is it that we use printk() in init code that may or may not be needed for the console (depending on platform, Kconfigs etc.)?
* Or is it that we allow implicit initializations during printk()?
I think the latter is easier to fix by design, e.g. everything used by printk()
should already be initialized before or during console_init().
For the last problem that led to this patch, that could be done by introducing
an init function to the monotonic timer API (as a fall-back, timer_monotonic_get()
could still call it if necessary).
In case we are still hit by a recursion (a printk() on the wrong path can
always happen, no matter how well we are prepared), we could still print
something very simple, using console_tx_byte() directly?
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49942
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I742e4087bffa64897e9ffa47531d37e42fb2c63e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 49942
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter(a)users.sourceforge.net>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:22:58 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph(a)9elements.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Julius Werner <jwerner(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Patrick Rudolph.
HAOUAS Elyes has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50269 )
Change subject: oc/intel/skylake/acpi/irqlinks.asl: Fix typo in comment
......................................................................
oc/intel/skylake/acpi/irqlinks.asl: Fix typo in comment
Change-Id: Ifbe012a9867a6814f64abcfe336e5edca19df879
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
---
M src/soc/intel/skylake/acpi/irqlinks.asl
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/69/50269/1
diff --git a/src/soc/intel/skylake/acpi/irqlinks.asl b/src/soc/intel/skylake/acpi/irqlinks.asl
index da82523..483be59 100644
--- a/src/soc/intel/skylake/acpi/irqlinks.asl
+++ b/src/soc/intel/skylake/acpi/irqlinks.asl
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
*
* Due to what appears to be an ACPI interpreter bug we do not use
* the PCRB() method here as it may not be defined yet because the method
- * definiton depends on the order of the include files in pch.asl.
+ * definition depends on the order of the include files in pch.asl.
*
* https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
*/
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50269
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifbe012a9867a6814f64abcfe336e5edca19df879
Gerrit-Change-Number: 50269
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
HAOUAS Elyes has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50268 )
Change subject: payloads/libpayload/arch/arm64/mmu.c: Fix typo in comment
......................................................................
payloads/libpayload/arch/arm64/mmu.c: Fix typo in comment
Change-Id: Ieb10a881ef1d983f11318f0f6934491fd19fd0bf
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
---
M payloads/libpayload/arch/arm64/mmu.c
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/68/50268/1
diff --git a/payloads/libpayload/arch/arm64/mmu.c b/payloads/libpayload/arch/arm64/mmu.c
index bc4c233..4c8f8c1 100644
--- a/payloads/libpayload/arch/arm64/mmu.c
+++ b/payloads/libpayload/arch/arm64/mmu.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@
/*
* Func: mmu_is_range_free
- * Desc: We need to ensure that the new range being allocated doesnt overlap
+ * Desc: We need to ensure that the new range being allocated doesn't overlap
* with any used memory range. Basically:
* 1. Memory ranges used by the payload (usedmem_ranges)
* 2. Any area that falls below _end symbol in linker script (Kernel needs to be
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50268
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ieb10a881ef1d983f11318f0f6934491fd19fd0bf
Gerrit-Change-Number: 50268
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas(a)noos.fr>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Attention is currently required from: Martin Roth, Tony Huang, Wisley Chen.
Karthik Ramasubramanian has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50255 )
Change subject: mb/google/dedede: Create kracko variant
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
Ideally the SPD Bin for memory parts and device tree configuration should be separate CLs of their own. This CL should just be created as is from the template.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50255
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7f8c7a4d4967e99896166ec9dd6b7381b7f6e5ed
Gerrit-Change-Number: 50255
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Tony Huang <tony-huang(a)quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Wisley Chen <wisley.chen(a)quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Tony Huang <tony-huang(a)quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Wisley Chen <wisley.chen(a)quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:17:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Martin Roth.
chris wang has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50240 )
Change subject: soc/amd/picasso: add UPD for USB3 phy setting adjust
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(1 comment)
File src/soc/amd/picasso/fsp_params.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50240/comment/ed6e1cf6_46ae0d7d
PS4, Line 131: memcpy(&scfg->usb_3_port0_phy_tune, &cfg->usb3_phy_tune_params[0],
: sizeof(scfg->usb_3_port0_phy_tune[0]));
> Right, I'm just wondering if the enable should be more. […]
yes, The default value was given in both trembyle and dalboz devtree. and the value is refer to the AGESA. Also remove the if condition and let UPD use the default setting if no variant wants to override it.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50240
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1d5f69e840952cc5171af1ce8597628d1bede5cb
Gerrit-Change-Number: 50240
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: chris wang <Chris.Wang(a)amd.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Chris Wang <chris.wang(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:15:56 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: chris wang <Chris.Wang(a)amd.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: chris wang.
Hello build bot (Jenkins), Jason Glenesk, Raul Rangel, Marshall Dawson, Chris Wang, Felix Held,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50240
to look at the new patch set (#7).
Change subject: soc/amd/picasso: add UPD for USB3 phy setting adjust
......................................................................
soc/amd/picasso: add UPD for USB3 phy setting adjust
add UPD for USB3 phy setting adjust
Usb 3.1 PHY Parameters:
1. RX_EQ_DELTA_IQ_OVRD_VAL
-Override value for rx_eq_delta_iq. Range 0-0xF
2. RX_EQ_DELTA_IQ_OVRD_EN
-Enable override value for rx_eq_delta_iq. Range 0-0x1
3. Override value for rx_vref_ctrl. Range 0 - 0x1F
4. Enable override value for rx_vref_ctrl. Range 0 - 0x1
5. Override value for tx_vboost_lvl: 0 - 0x7.
6. Enable override value for tx_vboost_lvl. Range: 0 - 0x1
7. Override value for rx_vref_ctrl. Range 0 - 0x1F
8. Enable override value for rx_vref_ctrl. Range 0 - 0x1
9. Override value for tx_vboost_lvl: 0 - 0x7.
10. Enable override value for tx_vboost_lvl. Range: 0 - 0x1
BUG=b:175192931
TEST=Build/verify the valule will been apply on dirinboz
Change-Id: I1d5f69e840952cc5171af1ce8597628d1bede5cb
Signed-off-by: Chris Wang <chris.wang(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
---
M src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/devicetree_dalboz.cb
M src/mainboard/google/zork/variants/baseboard/devicetree_trembyle.cb
M src/soc/amd/picasso/chip.h
M src/soc/amd/picasso/fsp_params.c
M src/vendorcode/amd/fsp/picasso/FspsUpd.h
5 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/40/50240/7
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50240
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1d5f69e840952cc5171af1ce8597628d1bede5cb
Gerrit-Change-Number: 50240
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: chris wang <Chris.Wang(a)amd.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Chris Wang <chris.wang(a)amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Felix Held <felix-coreboot(a)felixheld.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: chris wang <Chris.Wang(a)amd.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: Damien Zammit, Angel Pons, Arthur Heymans, Alexander Couzens, Patrick Rudolph.
Nico Huber has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50036 )
Change subject: intel: Turn `DEFAULT_RCBA` into a Kconfig symbol
......................................................................
Patch Set 4: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
File src/southbridge/intel/common/rcba.h:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50036/comment/53b5741f_922c544b
PS4, Line 6: DEFAULT_RCBA
Maybe rename to something meaningful? E.g. RCBA_POINTER?
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50036
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I642958fbd6f02dbf54812d6a75d6bc3087acc77a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 50036
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Couzens <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Damien Zammit
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h(a)gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Damien Zammit
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Arthur Heymans <arthur(a)aheymans.xyz>
Gerrit-Attention: Alexander Couzens <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:02:22 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment