Attention is currently required from: Raul Rangel, Furquan Shaikh, Martin Roth, Mathew King.
Karthik Ramasubramanian has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52908 )
Change subject: mb/google/guybrush: Configure wake resource for WiFi
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52908/comment/fd7ed953_3bc6fc31
PS1, Line 13: is added to SSDT.
> It means that the OSPM is not really setting it correctly. What does `cat /proc/acpi/wakeup` show?
cat /proc/acpi/wakeup lists WF00 device
> Interesting. It means that the GPE enable bit is somehow not getting set correctly. Do you see the GPE STS bit set correctly in your experiment now?
Yes. I also see the concerned bit set in SMI:event_status register in the resume path.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52908
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic238d9606aea20c058e9b47093693f10b14e6288
Gerrit-Change-Number: 52908
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mathew King <mathewk(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Mathew King <mathewk(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 23:58:08 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: David Wu, Furquan Shaikh, Henry Sun, Marco Chen.
Karthik Ramasubramanian has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52851 )
Change subject: mb/google/dedede/var/magolor: Select touchscreen based on SSFC in FW_CONFIG
......................................................................
Patch Set 6:
(2 comments)
File src/mainboard/google/dedede/variants/magolor/overridetree.cb:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52851/comment/954795aa_8dbcb96b
PS5, Line 2: field CAMERA_WFC 38 40
> I am afraid that the bit usage of SSFC is out of sync with EC side already. […]
Different variants have different components and different sources. Hence the scope of SSFC is preferred to be per-variant instead of baseboard. This also means we can keep bit allocations (offset and number of bits) in a per-variant manner.
File src/mainboard/google/dedede/variants/magolor/overridetree.cb:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52851/comment/79a042c3_63491beb
PS6, Line 208: 10
Can we not program the touch panel to use a different I2C address to solve this issue?
Except for the hardware ID, the entire power sequencing for this 14" panel and ELAN6915 11" panel are identical.
The way SSFC is used in this CL is not how it meant to be used. Also we would have already released devices with panel size unprovisioned. This change is going to break the touch panel in those unprovisioned devices.
If SSFC still needs to be used, I would prefer to allocate a unique ID for each touchpanel and probe them in the devicetree i.e.
fw_config TS_SOURCE 41 44
option TS_UNPROVISIONED 0
option TS_ELAN_6915 1
option TS_ELAN_6918 2
option TS_ELAN_0001 3
option TS_RAYD_0001 4
end
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52851
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I087ea677a8865fc8c5b3f7c9773bd7f97924dbb3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 52851
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: David Wu <david_wu(a)quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Henry Sun <henrysun(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Marco Chen <marcochen(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: David Wu <david_wu(a)quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Henry Sun <henrysun(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Marco Chen <marcochen(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 23:54:27 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Marco Chen <marcochen(a)google.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Bora Guvendik, Anil Kumar K, Cliff Huang, Selma Bensaid, Bernardo Perez Priego.
Bora Guvendik has uploaded a new patch set (#5) to the change originally created by Thejaswani Putta. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54023 )
Change subject: mb/intel/adlrvp_m: Enable CR50 TPM support over SPI
......................................................................
mb/intel/adlrvp_m: Enable CR50 TPM support over SPI
Add Kconfig options and enable TPM device in devicetree
BUG=None
TEST=Booted the image and checked the successful TPM
communication in verstage,romstage & ramstage from
coreboot logs.
Signed-off-by: Thejaswani Puta thejaswani.putta(a)intel.com <thejaswani.putta(a)intel.com>
Change-Id: Icaedf9f17e35e82c35cbabd6d2938c167e42e9e8
---
M src/mainboard/intel/adlrvp/Kconfig
M src/mainboard/intel/adlrvp/devicetree_m.cb
M src/mainboard/intel/adlrvp/early_gpio_m.c
M src/mainboard/intel/adlrvp/gpio_m.c
4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/23/54023/5
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54023
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Icaedf9f17e35e82c35cbabd6d2938c167e42e9e8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 54023
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: Thejaswani Putta <thejaswani.putta(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anil Kumar K <anil.kumar.k(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bernardo Perez Priego <bernardo.perez.priego(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Cliff Huang <cliff.huang(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Selma Bensaid <selma.bensaid(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Anil Kumar K <anil.kumar.k(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Cliff Huang <cliff.huang(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Selma Bensaid <selma.bensaid(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Bernardo Perez Priego <bernardo.perez.priego(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: Raul Rangel, Martin Roth, Mathew King, Karthik Ramasubramanian.
Furquan Shaikh has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52908 )
Change subject: mb/google/guybrush: Configure wake resource for WiFi
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52908/comment/7c1b8a72_02a507a5
PS1, Line 13: is added to SSDT.
> Checked it in the resume path (as part of event log SMI handler and logged in the eventlog).
It means that the OSPM is not really setting it correctly. What does `cat /proc/acpi/wakeup` show?
> Performed a rogue experiment of setting the bit corresponding to GEVENT_8 in SMI:event_enable register as part of S0ix entry. With that bit set, I was able to wakeup the system using Wake on WLAN disconnect.
Interesting. It means that the GPE enable bit is somehow not getting set correctly. Do you see the GPE STS bit set correctly in your experiment now?
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52908
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic238d9606aea20c058e9b47093693f10b14e6288
Gerrit-Change-Number: 52908
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mathew King <mathewk(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Raul Rangel <rrangel(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Martin Roth <martinroth(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Mathew King <mathewk(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 23:53:11 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Bora Guvendik, Maulik V Vaghela, Selma Bensaid, Tim Wawrzynczak, Patrick Rudolph.
Furquan Shaikh has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54036 )
Change subject: [WIP]soc/intel/alderlake: Update meminit code due to upd changes FSP 2147 onwards
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(4 comments)
Commit Message:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54036/comment/9508690c_d07c0d70
PS1, Line 7: WIP
Understand that this is still WIP. Provided some early comments.
File src/soc/intel/alderlake/meminit.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54036/comment/e5983c30_2f6d581d
PS1, Line 135: disable_dimm_upds
This should be renamed to `disable_channel_upds` and the pointers need update too.
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54036/comment/3f977e96_d0ebcbd8
PS1, Line 164:
nit: Instead of disabling all channels individually above, you can use a flag here:
bool enable_channel = 0;
and do this:
if (*spd_ptr) {
enable_channel = 1;
}
and after the `for (dimm = 0...)` loop, you can set:
*disable_channel_ptr = !enable_channel;
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54036/comment/ec197a15_7c81041f
PS1, Line 168: break;
This is wrong. It will not set the SPD pointer for second DIMM in case of DIMM modules where there are multiple DIMMs per channel.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54036
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5af11ae99db3bbe3373a9bd4ce36453b58d62fec
Gerrit-Change-Number: 54036
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Selma Bensaid <selma.bensaid(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Selma Bensaid <selma.bensaid(a)intel.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak(a)chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 23:42:33 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: Vitaly Rodionov, Angel Pons, Marco Chen, Karthik Ramasubramanian.
Furquan Shaikh has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52981 )
Change subject: drivers/i2c/cs42l42: Make HS_BIAS_SENSE_EN optional
......................................................................
Patch Set 5: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
File src/drivers/i2c/cs42l42/chip.h:
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52981/comment/1fde4459_be651af9
PS4, Line 118: Default =
> In this case, coreboot will always generate the property, so the kernel default is meaningless.
I had made a similar comment on the original CL for this driver. But the author felt it was helpful to have the kernel default in there as well.
--
To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52981
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I87c6f01af1bdb5b1cb8e399191519598d7fbe9ea
Gerrit-Change-Number: 52981
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: Vitaly Rodionov <vitaly.rodionov(a)cirrus.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: EricR Lai <ericr_lai(a)compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Marco Chen <marcochen(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Alan Lee <alan_lee(a)compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Vitaly Rodionov <vitaly.rodionov(a)cirrus.corp-partner.google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Marco Chen <marcochen(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub(a)google.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 23:22:31 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: Furquan Shaikh <furquan(a)google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Vitaly Rodionov <vitaly.rodionov(a)cirrus.corp-partner.google.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Angel Pons <th3fanbus(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment