Attention is currently required from: Fred Reitberger, Jason Glenesk, Matt DeVillier.
Hello Fred Reitberger, Jason Glenesk, Matt DeVillier,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80218?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: soc/amd: use expected function signature for soc_acpi_write_tables ......................................................................
soc/amd: use expected function signature for soc_acpi_write_tables
A pointer to soc_acpi_write_tables gets assigned to the write_acpi_tables element of the device_operations struct, so make sure that the function has the expected function signature which in this case means using unsigned long as type for both the 'current' parameter and the return value.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held felix-coreboot@felixheld.de Change-Id: Iee45badb904fa20c6db146edbc00c40ca09361d1 --- M src/soc/amd/cezanne/agesa_acpi.c M src/soc/amd/cezanne/include/soc/acpi.h M src/soc/amd/glinda/agesa_acpi.c M src/soc/amd/glinda/include/soc/acpi.h M src/soc/amd/mendocino/agesa_acpi.c M src/soc/amd/mendocino/include/soc/acpi.h M src/soc/amd/phoenix/agesa_acpi.c M src/soc/amd/phoenix/include/soc/acpi.h M src/soc/amd/picasso/agesa_acpi.c M src/soc/amd/picasso/include/soc/acpi.h 10 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/18/80218/2