Change in coreboot[master]: lib/edid.c: Return value differentiates absent and non-confo...

[Arthur Heymans (Code Review)]

Arthur Heymans has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/19502 )

Change subject: lib/edid.c: Return value differentiates absent and non-conformant
......................................................................

Patch Set 4:

(1 comment)

Some other code was using return value. Should those bail out on EDID_ABSENT or EDID_NOT_CONFORMANT ?

https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/19502/3/src/lib/edid.c
File src/lib/edid.c:

PS3, Line 1490: !c.conformant
> EDID_CONFORMANT == 0. This check isn't appropriate any more. There appears

Thanks for spotting this.