Patrick Georgi has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54343 )
Change subject: cpu/x86/smm: Fix u32 type mismatch in print statement ......................................................................
cpu/x86/smm: Fix u32 type mismatch in print statement
The 64-bit compiler x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-10 aborts the build with the format warning below:
CC ramstage/cpu/x86/smm/smm_module_loader.o src/cpu/x86/smm/smm_module_loader.c:415:42: error: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=format=] 415 | printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: stack_end = 0x%lx\n", | ~~^ | | | long unsigned int | %x 416 | __func__, stub_params->stack_top - total_stack_size); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | u32 {aka unsigned int}
The size of `size_t` differs between i386-elf (32-bit) and x86_64-elf/x86_64-linux-gnu (64-bit).
Unfortunately, coreboot hardcodes
src/include/inttypes.h:#define PRIx32 "x"
so `PRIx32` cannot be used.
There use `z` as length modifier, as size_t should be always big enough to hold the value.
Found-by: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-10 (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110 Fixes: afb7a814 ("cpu/x86/smm: Introduce SMM module loader version 2") Change-Id: Ib504bc5e5b19f62d4702b7f485522a2ee3d26685 Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54343 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) no-reply@coreboot.org Reviewed-by: Felix Held felix-coreboot@felixheld.de --- M src/cpu/x86/smm/smm_module_loader.c 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Approvals: build bot (Jenkins): Verified Felix Held: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/src/cpu/x86/smm/smm_module_loader.c b/src/cpu/x86/smm/smm_module_loader.c index 9f0ae92..101b7c5 100644 --- a/src/cpu/x86/smm/smm_module_loader.c +++ b/src/cpu/x86/smm/smm_module_loader.c @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@
const size_t total_stack_size = params->num_concurrent_stacks * params->per_cpu_stack_size; - printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: stack_end = 0x%lx\n", + printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: stack_end = 0x%zx\n", __func__, stub_params->stack_top - total_stack_size); printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: stack_top = 0x%x\n", __func__, stub_params->stack_top);