Change in ...coreboot[master]: Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas
Patrick Georgi has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31415
Change subject: Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas ......................................................................
Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas
A couple people discussed recently how it's a shame that on some architectures we can bring up a device but then have nothing to do with it afterwards. Having payloads to choose from would help a lot there.
Change-Id: Ia66f22947d09afe3076cc2ee12f5b652fe80fc3a Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi pgeorgi@google.com --- M Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/15/31415/1
diff --git a/Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md b/Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md index 0a39a88..7bcf2c7 100644 --- a/Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md +++ b/Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md @@ -72,3 +72,21 @@ hardware is available.
### Mentors + +## Port payloads to ARM, AArch64, MIPS or RISC-V +While we have a rather big set of payloads for x86 based platforms, all other +architectures are rather limited. Improve the situation by porting a payload +to one of the platforms, for example GRUB2, U-Boot (the UI part), Tianocore, +yabits, FILO, or Linux-as-Payload. + +Since this is a bit of a catch-all idea, an application to GSoC should pick a +combination of payload and architecture to support. + +### Requirements +* coreboot knowledge: Should konw the general boot flow in coreboot +* other knowledge: It helps to be familiar with the architecture you want to + work on. +* hardware requirements: Much of this can be done in QEMU or other emulators, + but the ability to test on real hardware is a plus. + +### Mentors
Paul Menzel has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31415 )
Change subject: Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas ......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31415/1/Documentation/contributing/project_i... File Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31415/1/Documentation/contributing/project_i... PS1, Line 86: konw know
Hello Ron Minnich, Paul Menzel, build bot (Jenkins),
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31415
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas ......................................................................
Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas
A couple people discussed recently how it's a shame that on some architectures we can bring up a device but then have nothing to do with it afterwards. Having payloads to choose from would help a lot there.
Change-Id: Ia66f22947d09afe3076cc2ee12f5b652fe80fc3a Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi pgeorgi@google.com --- M Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/15/31415/2
Hello Ron Minnich, Paul Menzel, build bot (Jenkins),
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31415
to look at the new patch set (#3).
Change subject: Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas ......................................................................
Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas
A couple people discussed recently how it's a shame that on some architectures we can bring up a device but then have nothing to do with it afterwards. Having payloads to choose from would help a lot there.
Change-Id: Ia66f22947d09afe3076cc2ee12f5b652fe80fc3a Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi pgeorgi@google.com --- M Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/15/31415/3
Arthur Heymans has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31415 )
Change subject: Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas ......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2
Angel Pons has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31415 )
Change subject: Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas ......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31415/3/Documentation/contributing/project_i... File Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31415/3/Documentation/contributing/project_i... PS3, Line 96: Maybe add a "-" here, since it is a compound adjective
Patrick Georgi has submitted this change and it was merged. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31415 )
Change subject: Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas ......................................................................
Documentation: Add broader payload coverage to project ideas
A couple people discussed recently how it's a shame that on some architectures we can bring up a device but then have nothing to do with it afterwards. Having payloads to choose from would help a lot there.
Change-Id: Ia66f22947d09afe3076cc2ee12f5b652fe80fc3a Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi pgeorgi@google.com Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31415 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) no-reply@coreboot.org Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans arthur@aheymans.xyz Reviewed-by: Angel Pons th3fanbus@gmail.com --- M Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Approvals: build bot (Jenkins): Verified Arthur Heymans: Looks good to me, approved Angel Pons: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md b/Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md index 1c23cc6..2e43871 100644 --- a/Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md +++ b/Documentation/contributing/project_ideas.md @@ -91,3 +91,22 @@
### Mentors * Werner Zeh werner.zeh@gmx.net + +## Port payloads to ARM, AArch64, MIPS or RISC-V +While we have a rather big set of payloads for x86 based platforms, all other +architectures are rather limited. Improve the situation by porting a payload +to one of the platforms, for example GRUB2, U-Boot (the UI part), Tianocore, +yabits, FILO, or Linux-as-Payload. + +Since this is a bit of a catch-all idea, an application to GSoC should pick a +combination of payload and architecture to support. + +### Requirements +* coreboot knowledge: Should know the general boot flow in coreboot +* other knowledge: It helps to be familiar with the architecture you want to + work on. +* hardware requirements: Much of this can be done in QEMU or other emulators, + but the ability to test on real hardware is a plus. + +### Mentors +* Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org for U-Boot payload projects
-
Angel Pons (Code Review) -
Arthur Heymans (Code Review)
-
Patrick Georgi (Code Review)
-
Paul Menzel (Code Review)