[S] Change in coreboot[main]: drivers/intel/fsp2_0: Add dedicated caller function for ap procedure ...

[Subrata Banik (Code Review)]

Subrata Banik has submitted this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81663?usp=email )

(

11 is the latest approved patch-set.
No files were changed between the latest approved patch-set and the submitted one.
 )Change subject: drivers/intel/fsp2_0: Add dedicated caller function for ap procedure calls
......................................................................

drivers/intel/fsp2_0: Add dedicated caller function for ap procedure calls

Add FSP 2 Multi Processor Platform Initialization module a function
indirection to ensure that efi_ap_procedure functions are called with
the appropriate C calling convention.

BUG=b:329034258
TEST=Verified both x86_32 and x86_64 builds on Meteor Lake board (Rex)

Change-Id: I64e65b2941207375d5e27c84aa26061e7e72a7f6
Signed-off-by: Appukuttan V K 
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/81663
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik 
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) 
---
M src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Approvals:
  Subrata Banik: Looks good to me, approved
  build bot (Jenkins): Verified

diff --git a/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c b/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c
index a891ba0..41fccd6 100644
--- a/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c
+++ b/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ppi/mp_service_ppi.c
@@ -12,6 +12,18 @@

#define BSP_CPU_SLOT 0

+struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params {
+	efi_ap_procedure procedure;
+	void *argument;
+};
+
+static void efi_ap_procedure_caller(void *arg)
+{
+	struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params *params =
+		(struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params *)arg;
+	params->procedure(params->argument);
+}
+
 efi_return_status_t mp_get_number_of_processors(efi_uintn_t *number_of_processors,
    efi_uintn_t *number_of_enabled_processors)
 {
@@ -58,14 +70,19 @@
 efi_return_status_t mp_startup_all_aps(efi_ap_procedure procedure,
    bool run_serial, efi_uintn_t timeout_usec, void *argument)
 {
+	struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params params = {
+		.procedure = procedure,
+		.argument = argument
+	};
+
    if (!cpu_info())
    	return FSP_DEVICE_ERROR;

if (procedure == NULL)
    	return FSP_INVALID_PARAMETER;

-	if (mp_run_on_all_aps((void *)procedure, argument, timeout_usec, !run_serial) !=
-				CB_SUCCESS) {
+	if (mp_run_on_all_aps((void *)efi_ap_procedure_caller, &params,
+			      timeout_usec, !run_serial) != CB_SUCCESS) {
    	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: Exit with Failure\n", __func__);
    	return FSP_NOT_STARTED;
    }
@@ -76,6 +93,11 @@
 efi_return_status_t mp_startup_all_cpus(efi_ap_procedure procedure,
    efi_uintn_t timeout_usec, void *argument)
 {
+	struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params params = {
+		.procedure = procedure,
+		.argument = argument
+	};
+
    if (!cpu_info())
    	return FSP_DEVICE_ERROR;

@@ -99,8 +121,8 @@
     * due to lack of acquiring a spin lock while accessing common data structure in
     * multiprocessor environment.
     */
-	if (mp_run_on_all_aps((void *)procedure, argument, timeout_usec, false) !=
-				CB_SUCCESS) {
+	if (mp_run_on_all_aps((void *)efi_ap_procedure_caller,
+			      &params, timeout_usec, false) != CB_SUCCESS) {
    	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: Exit with Failure\n", __func__);
    	return FSP_NOT_STARTED;
    }
@@ -111,6 +133,11 @@
 efi_return_status_t mp_startup_this_ap(efi_ap_procedure procedure,
    efi_uintn_t processor_number, efi_uintn_t timeout_usec, void *argument)
 {
+	struct efi_ap_procedure_caller_params params = {
+		.procedure = procedure,
+		.argument = argument
+	};
+
    if (!cpu_info())
    	return FSP_DEVICE_ERROR;

@@ -123,7 +150,7 @@
    if (procedure == NULL)
    	return FSP_INVALID_PARAMETER;

-	if (mp_run_on_aps((void *)procedure, argument,
+	if (mp_run_on_aps((void *)efi_ap_procedure_caller, &params,
    		processor_number, timeout_usec) != CB_SUCCESS) {
    	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "%s: Exit with Failure\n", __func__);
    	return FSP_NOT_STARTED;