Furquan Shaikh has posted comments on this change. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31250 )
Change subject: soc/intel/cannonlake: Configure GPIOs again after FSP-S is done
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31250/3/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/chip.c
File src/soc/intel/cannonlake/chip.c:
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/31250/3/src/soc/intel/cannonlake/chip.c@159
PS3, Line 159: PCH_H
I see you said it isn't needed, but is there a downside to enabling?
Actually, gpio.c is kind of separate for PCH-H and I did not want to duplicate the code (in the hope that FSP will get fixed pretty soon). But, since we are not sure of the timeline, its probably better to just do it unconditionally. I have moved cnl_configure_pads to chip.c.
--
To view, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31250
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://review.coreboot.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: coreboot
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7787aa8f185f633627bcedc7f23504bf4a5250b4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31250
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Furquan Shaikh
furquan@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron Durbin
adurbin@chromium.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Duncan Laurie
dlaurie@chromium.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Furquan Shaikh
furquan@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Rudolph
siro@das-labor.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Shelley Chen
shchen@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins)
no-reply@coreboot.org
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 01:22:10 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Duncan Laurie
dlaurie@chromium.org
Gerrit-MessageType: comment