Change in coreboot[master]: util/crossgcc: Update fls function name for binutils nds32 patch

[Martin Roth (Code Review)]

Martin Roth has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/28363

Change subject: util/crossgcc: Update fls function name for binutils nds32 patch
......................................................................

util/crossgcc: Update fls function name for binutils nds32 patch

When building the toolchain in FreeBSD, the function fls conflicts
with the native fls function.  Just rename this one since it's only
used within the single file in the patch.

Change-Id: Iff2019bf4fce2e07e4f78605411bb3fc4f324de7
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth 
---
M util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.30_nds32.patch
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/coreboot refs/changes/63/28363/1

diff --git a/util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.30_nds32.patch b/util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.30_nds32.patch
index 9608265..88252c4 100644
--- a/util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.30_nds32.patch
+++ b/util/crossgcc/patches/binutils-2.30_nds32.patch
@@ -5839,7 +5839,7 @@
 +}
 +
 +static unsigned int
-+fls (register unsigned int x)
++fls_ (register unsigned int x)
 +{
 +  return ffs (x & (-x));
 +}
@@ -6698,14 +6698,14 @@
 -	      break;
 +	    if (1 < ones32 (tls_type))
 +	      {
-+		eff_tls_type = 1 << (fls (tls_type) - 1);
++		eff_tls_type = 1 << (fls_ (tls_type) - 1);
 +		/* TLS model shall be handled in nds32_elf_unify_tls_model ()  */
 +
 +		/* TLS model X -> LE is not implement yet!
 +		 * workaround here!  */
 +		if (eff_tls_type == GOT_TLS_LE)
 +		  {
-+		    eff_tls_type = 1 << (fls (tls_type ^ eff_tls_type) - 1);
++		    eff_tls_type = 1 << (fls_ (tls_type ^ eff_tls_type) - 1);
 +		  }
 +	      }

@@ -11865,7 +11865,7 @@
    	}
 -	      irel_ptr = irel_ptr->next;
 +
-+	      eff_tls_type = 1 << (fls (tls_type) - 1);
++	      eff_tls_type = 1 << (fls_ (tls_type) - 1);
 +	      sethi_rt = N32_RT5(bfd_getb32 (contents + irel->r_offset));
        }